Skip to content


Sixty Seconds for a Three Sixty

No comments

As I was contemplating the development of a posting for today, one that was intended to pose a few rhetorical questions for the day, I came across an email forward to me by a good friend Brian O’Malley a motivational speaker, with a proclamation that provided a three-sixty (360) review to a recent strategic alignment meeting I participated in.

As I looked at the words and phrased statements, it became obvious that these thirty-six words aligned compactly within twelve lines provide a distinct three hundred and sixty degree perspective on much of what each of us should strive for; each day, on each shift, and at every call.

These are demanding times that accellerate a varity of emotions, uncertaintly and at times of personal discovery. Regardless of your rank, or time in grade, the length of time in your organization or the size and structure of your department, your daily demands and challenges; leadership, mentoring, contributing, setting the example, being at your very best individually or collectively as part of a team, a company or a department is essential and pivotal-Think about it…..

  • Find your Energy
  • Explore your Strengths
  • Discover you Passion
  • Expand your Perspective
  • Understand your Beliefs
  • Choose your Attitude
  • Align your Behaviors
  • Challenge your Perception
  • Define your Success
  • Live your Value
  • State your Mission
  • Proclaim your Purpose

Take the time to look at this video HERE, take the time to Celebrate What’s Right…..

Buildings Under Construction

1 comment

It’s been a busy week for a couple of departments nationally with major fires at buildings under construction. A multiple alarm fire struck a 5 –story Apartment Complex in Renton, Washington that occupies nearly a full city block on Tuesday June 30th, HERE and HERE for details.

On Monday June 29th, a spectacular multiple alarm fire destroyed approximately 55 townhouses that were under construction in Mississauga, Ontario Canada. HERE and HERE for details.

Buildings and construction sites pose unique strategic and tactical operational profiles and are considered high risk incidents to both manage and operate at. What were the operational and safety issues you may have encountered at similar events in your own jurisdiction?

Check out the Ten Minutes in the Street: Buildings under Construction-Fire Scenario posted at FFN, HERE
The building environments that form and shape our respective response districts pose unique challenges to the day-to-day responses of fire departments and their subsequent operations at structural alarms. With the variety of occupancies and building characteristics present, there are definable degrees of risk potential with recognizable measures that must be taken.

Although each occupancy type presents variables that dictate how a particular incident is handled, most company operations evolve from basic strategic and tactical principles rooted in past performance and operations at similar structures. With any structure, regardless of its construction type, materials, occupancy classification, age or size, the majority of incidents requiring actual operation time occur when the structure is in use or vacant.

But what about the early stages of the life cycle of a building – when a company is called to respond to an incident at a building under construction or at a construction site? Fire department responses and operations at building and construction sites present unique circumstances and considerations that are not part of that day-to-day alarm response procedure.

During the construction process, building and construction sites represent the highest potential for fire, injuries and large-scale operations than at any other time within the life cycle of a structure. When completed, the building may have state-of-the-art detection and suppression equipment present, it may be compartmentalized and use the best fire resistive materials available. However, during the construction process the building represents a high-risk target hazard with the potential to stretch to the limit the capabilities and resources of any fire service agency.

Buildings can be classified within five fundamental construction types:

  • Fire-Resistive
  • Non-Combustible
  • Ordinary (exterior protected)
  • Heavy Timber
  • Wood Frame

These are represented in various forms and sub-classifications within the NFPA 220 Standard on Types of Building Construction, as well as other Model Codes

Regardless of construction classification, during the construction process each building can be affected adversely by flame and heat impingement due to fires, weather and environmental conditions, improper or inadequate construction techniques and methods as well as substandard or inappropriate construction materials and system assemblies.

When referring to the broad range of building and construction sites, there are five general classifications for most projects:

  • Renovations
  • Rehabilitations
  • Conversions
  • Expansions
  • New construction

Although there are some overlaps, each project presents hazards that affect life safety, structural integrity and exposures. Projects within the renovation and rehabilitation areas may include vacant or abandoned structures that are transformed into new occupancy/use buildings, or can include older structures that are brought back to their original state. Current development trends are those in which older structures of brick-and-joist construction typically are renovated into commercial shopping centers, apartments and mixed-use occupancies. In many instances, the building interiors are altered extensively to accommodate the design criteria and, in doing so, may alter the integrity of the structures.

Conversions usually involve change from one occupancy use to another. For example, a factory used for manufacturing is converted into arts and crafts shops or into a multiple-occupancy facility. Most sought after structures of this kind include the heavy timber building (New England Mill Type) as well as old, reinforced concrete frame or steel-framed factory or manufacturing structures. Expansions, on the other hand, constitute existing buildings that broaden their building layouts and floor areas to accommodate the owners’ needs. Many times the buildings will stay in operation while the expansion construction is undertaken, creating myriad life safety, suppression and control concerns.

New construction involves site preparation, mobilization of materials and manpower and the evolution of a new structure. Each project category, when coupled with a specific construction type, presents specific hazards and conditions that must be identified, assessed and acted upon correctly. The potential that exists in any construction area during fire department response can include, but not be limited to:

  • Fire
  • Explosions
  • Collapse
  • Excavation & Trench Cave-In
  • Compromised Structural Conditions
  • Hazardous Materials Situations
  • Accidents
  • Failures

The ability for a fire department to intervene in the progression of an incident will be related directly to the magnitude of the incident, its complexity and its demands on resources, manpower and technical based competencies, familiarity with the site and construction methods used, the stage of construction, as well as the effectiveness of SOP’s/ SOG’s, communications and the incident command management structure of the involved agency.

The most critical aspect to any operation in a building or on a construction site is the effect the incident will have upon the surrounding area or construction. The hazards present on a building and/or construction site pose threats to workers on the site, firefighters, civilians and exposures. Any one of these categories can strain an operation and response. But add two, three or all four concerns and the situation, however small initially, can escalate into a complex operation involving multiple agencies and resources. All with variable risks for significant challenge to firefighter survivability and injuries.

Exposure threa
t to site workers creates life safety concerns that require determination of their work area assignments, numbers present and actual location for accountability. Information detailing the magnitude of the life safety concerns can be derived from on-site field offices and contractors’ trailers. The ability to relocate personnel from areas of immediate danger to an area of safe refuge may prove to be a major strategic undertaking. Limited access points, passenger elevator cranes and hoist ways present life safety concerns. Incident commanders and company officers also must consider firefighter life safety and have the ability to judge operational areas and surrounding construction exposures. Ventures into areas of recent concrete pours (“green” concrete) or suppression operations involving wood shoring, formwork or unprotected steel components could be fatal if decisions are based on faulty operations and decision-making parameters.

Civilian dangers include situations involving equipment failures, material drops and toxic products of combustion. Recent incidents involving crane collapses, exterior scaffolding assembly failures resulted in injuries and rescues at protected walkway areas. Materials falling or blowing off job sites onto streets and walkways, as well as mechanical and other equipment failures resulting in the collapse of building components onto vehicles and roadways, create situations requiring special attention for the incident stabilization and rescue.

Unique challenges to fire control are presented by exposure concerns and hazards at building construction sites. Depending on the construction stage and area(s) of fire involvement, materials present and construction type, the exposure concerns could be negligible to major. A job site consisting of three-story, wood-frame apartment units could create serious exposure concerns due to flying brands, rapid flame spread and fire intensity toward surrounding exposures, which include additional framed units under construction, construction equipment and fire apparatus, as well as adjacent structures and occupancies.

When such exposure concerns become evident, rapid deployment of additional response companies and resources should be communicated as quickly as possible. Often when the problem becomes evident, it may be too late to gain offensive fire control. Based on incident considerations, areas should be written off defensively, with protective measures deployed effectively to get ahead of the situation.

The complexities and hazards and assessment factors present at building and construction sites become the focus when a company is dispatched to an on-site incident. Each construction stage represents a milestone in the process that, when coupled with respective safety considerations, can give an incident commander or company officer insight into the risk potential present at the job site. The stages are represented by percent of completion of the project or structure. The stages overlap, as do some of the safety conditions and hazards.

Start up/mobilization to 15 percent Stage
Initial project start up is underway. At a jobsite involving new construction, site work is taking place and excavation, trench and subsurface work is in progress. Temporary roadways, usually consisting of exposed earth with gravel topping, are compacted. Adjacent utilities are tapped into with temporary on-site services. Construction equipment is mobilized or brought on site. Materials, components and equipment are stockpiled and stored. Temporary storage buildings are constructed and makeshift offices and rest areas for workers are built. Construction work includes laying the foundation, formwork placement and support structuring.

Risk potential is greatest when dealing with the stored/stockpiled equipment and materials and site considerations that affect emergency access and response and construction worker safety. Site accessibility may be hindered by excavation areas, site trenches and pits, construction worker vehicles and construction equipment, as well as temporary fencing and barricades.
Weather conditions may play a critical role in response access with temporary roadways and site areas affected by rain, snow, thawing and mud. Companies should determine, through site inspection and preplanning, designated entry gates to site areas, alternate access roads or areas to project locations and use of heavy construction equipment for accessibility.

Many times, response maps may not have information available for effective and accurate response. Coordination between local building officials and fire department commanders is a must. Incomplete connections, closed valves and inadequate water pressure can create water supply problems with on-site systems. Unknown or nonexistent hydrant locations may make it necessary to preplan alternate water sources. Additionally, during initial size up and incident assessment , take into account possible time delays for long and multiple hoselays.

Trench cave-ins, excavation collapses, shoring and framework failures present challenges to even the largest agency. Undertake pre-incident training to ensure safe and effective rescue operations. In response districts or divisions where extensive, ongoing construction is present, consider securing adequate trench/cave-in rescue equipment, material and tools and develop a company with trained personnel.

In the rehabilitation, renovation or conversion stages, interior and exterior finishes and materials may be in the process of removal or alteration. Interior partitions may be partially removed, with materials stockpiled and staged at various areas. This stockpiling, with its high fire loading, presents a potential hazard. A fire in a 52-story office building gutted the entire fourteenth floor of the structure, where building materials had been stocked for a renovation project. Interior floor and wall partition removal creates serious deficiencies in the compartmentalization capabilities of the areas, as well as allowing for avenues of fire travel both vertically and horizontally.

The 30 to 60 percent Stage.
This is the phase in which the structure begins to evolve into its designed form. The framing systems used rise up with materials being bolted, cast or framed in place. Skeletal steel frames are built up and the structure is fastened together temporarily to allow for the positioning of additional members. Inadequate or incomplete connection points could be affected by weather and environmental conditions, causing the structure to fail and collapse. The dead load of the material itself may shear connecting bolts. Unprotected steel columns and beams are affected by fire and heat exposure from even a small rubbish fire which, in turn, may cause the member to buckle, expand and collapse. Some steel framing may rely on cold-drawn steel cables to provide tension on the frame elements until the exterior skin is applied. These cables can fail at temperatures as low as 500 degrees Fahrenheit, precipitating a collapse.

Exposed cast-in-place, as well as precast concrete construction, also can be affected by fire and heat exposure. The connection points may fail at a faster rate than that of the material itself, due to the smaller mass of the connecting components. Additionally, the outer layers of concrete can break away when exposed to fire and hear. This action, called spalling, occurs when the moisture content within the concrete is drawn out due to extreme heat conditions. There are two types of spalling. The first is an explosive kind that blows the material in large components away from the members, causing the pieces to be propelled outward toward operating companies, often accompanied by a loud noise. The second type of spalling is a dropping off or flaking action in which the spalling falls from the components with little force. Regardless of the action type, the size of the spall material may be such that crushing injuries are sustained.

<
p>
Since both precast and cast-in-place concrete rely on steel reinforcement for its tensile strength capabilities (the concrete itself provides the compressive strength), spalling actions cause the embedded steel “rebars” to be exposed to the heating and expansion action of heat and fire conditions. This can cause the materials to separate, loosening the bonding action and causing a collapse. Additionally, concrete when applied in a cast-in-place application – where the concrete relies on formwork that is held in place by adjustable steel column rods, wood shoring and bracing – creates an extremely high fire load factor.

Typically, concrete requires a 28-day cycle to cure to reach its compressive its design strength. Any fire conditions encountered within these formwork and shored floor areas should be treated as conditions in which the concrete is assumed to be “green” or freshly poured. No immediate fire suppression activities should be attempted within these floor areas because of the likelihood of collapse.

In wood -frame structures, again, the main concern can be toward fire suppression capabilities due to the fire loading of the materials present, as well as the surface-to-mass ratio as a result of exposed framing present. Be aware that rapid fire spread within single structures and to adjoining structures can occur.

As the structural framing is completed, the exterior skin or building envelope is applied. Windows and doors are fastened, interior partitions are framed and open floor areas begin to become compartmentalized. The mechanical, electrical and service systems begin to be put in place. During the 30 to 90 percent construction phases, there are still numerous conditions that contribute to fire.

According to NFPA studies as referenced within the NFPA 24 Standard, 60 percent of the fires occurring in buildings undergoing construction, alteration or demolition originates from three specific causes:

  • Salamanders or portable heating equipment (25 percent)
  • Cutting, welding and plumbers’ torch operations (20 percent)
  • Matches and smoking (15 percent)

During construction phase operations in adverse and cold climates, the use of portable heating devices and salamanders, along with heavy tarps and reinforced plastic sheeting cover the building to maintain a minimum temperature, is common.

Scaffolding around the perimeter of the building may be covered, allowing no visible indication of building type, materials or alarm response conditions upon the arrival of a company. The heating devices usually fueled by LPG tanks pose dangers because of valve and tank malfunctions, contact with combustible and exposure to fire areas during suppression operations. BLEVEs are common with construction site fires and must be considered when mounting an attack.

The 60 to 90 percent stage.
The conditions and hazards present within the 30 to 90 percent phase can be addressed in similar fashion. During this phase, rooms, floors and other areas are undergoing completion with more finish work done with fewer trade personnel.

During the early 60 to 75 percent stages, conditions still exist requiring full awareness of interior mobility, access and operations. There may be floor areas that still are incomplete or unprotected. Drop-offs and walk-offs may be present at any number of locations. Open shaft-ways, hoist ways, mechanical chase areas and stairwells may exist in uncompleted stages.
As in the previous 30 to 60 percent stage, floor obstructions, pipe stubs and capped-off services may exist. Firefighters should use personal lighting to detect whether walkway areas are clear and safe. Extreme care must be taken during the night and in smoky conditions to be certain of floor area integrity.

There are many times that shaftways and chase wells extending through multiple floors are covered temporarily with plywood. Although they may support a worker passing over them, they may not support a fully outfitted firefighter with SCBA and tools. Inadequate lighting conditions may exist throughout the complex and site, with many exposed electrical lines, conduits and power panels. Exposed wiring coming into contact with exposed steel framing and tools can energize a large area, endangering personnel in the immediate area.

As additional systems are put in place, such as HVAC duct work, plumbing and electrical lines, additional wall areas may be penetrated. Fires originating on one level or area may travel quickly due to convection and conduction. Built-in sprinkler systems may be inoperative due to incomplete pipe runs, closed valves, lines plugged from debris or non-capped branches.
Fire department connections may be blocked by dumpsters or heavy construction equipment. Interior standpipes may not reach to topped-off floor areas or may have open valves, incomplete connections or non-capped branches.

Assign manpower to valve determination if attempts at using the standpipe system prove inadequate. Many times an open valve at a lower level may be the culprit. Again, manpower allocations in these areas must be augmented by multiple-alarm and mutual-aid units early in the incident. As the finish work nears completion, stockpiles of new materials begin to form. Solvents, adhesives and flammable, combustible and toxic materials used in the finish/completion stages may be present in large quantities. Class A materials from packing, furniture and equipment boxes may be located throughout the structure.

Site accessibility improves as more of the interior building areas are completed. Paved access areas and roadways are completed; trenches, excavations and fill have been removed or backfilled. Exterior scaffolding, begins to be removed and heavy construction equipment and cranes are taken off-site. The final stage, consisting of the move-in, may not necessarily take place when the building is completed. Move-ins, when dealing with large-scale structures or high-rises, may take place on the bottom floors while construction proceeds in upper areas.
It is critical for the safe and effective stabilization and conclusion of any incident within these building sites to assume a greater degree of assessment and subsequent operations.

Assessment considerations include:

  • Construction type
  • Stage of construction
  • Site conditions and accessibility
  • Exposures
  • Resources
  • Operating procedures
  • Communications

All operations must assume the risk potential present for the deployment of manpower and equipment, with the full understanding of material, component and site condition integrity during suppression and emergency operations. The magnitude and complexity of the incident will be directly proportional to the size of the building/construction site and age of the existing building, if under renovation, and degree of construction.

Operational conditions must be addressed during strategic and tactical incident management:

  • Degree of exposed construction
  • Degree of incomplete connections
  • Number of exposures
  • Fire loading
  • Flammable/combustible materials
  • Compressed gases and vessels
  • “Green” concrete and shored, supported areas
  • Exposed electrical and utility services
  • Unprotected openings
  • Obstructions
  • Access
  • Lighting
  • Fire protection system integrity

The ability for a response agency to safely handle an emergency incident depends upon a set of specific operational factors that include but are not limited to:

  • Incident type
  • Size-up and Assessment Factors
  • Pre-Planning Awareness & Knowledge
  • Strong Command Presence
  • Effective Modular Incident Command Management System
  • Effective Communications
  • Mobilization/ Reflex Capabilities of Response Companies
  • Anticipate
    d & Immediate Resource Needs
  • Apparatus Deployment
  • Operational Modes
  • Exposure Concerns
  • Incident stabilization, time factors
  • Incident Control
  • Fire companies should periodically inspect the construction sites in their response districts. They can assess the risk potential present and preplan for potential incidents. Information should be transmitted to second and third-due company units in the event of a large-scale incident.
  • Serviceability of all existing fire suppression systems on-site must be ascertained. This, alone, may help control situations in a time frame where deployment, application and operation become critical.

Never assume, but be cautious and analytical in any incident that takes you to a building or construction site. The success of any operation will be dependent upon coordination of companies, technical basis of knowledge, skills and training, and the ability to remain highly flexible, based upon the continuum of information processing, cue-based analysis and incident command management.

Other resources HERE, HERE and HERE

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week Postings from FFN

No comments

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week postings from Firefighter Nation

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week; T minus One; “The Opposing Spectrum of Fire Service Safety Culture”
http://www.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/fireems-safety-health-and-1

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week; Day-One; “What’s It All About?”
http://www.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/fireems-safety-health-and-2

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Two. “Building Knowledge = Firefighter Safety”; Know Your District and its Risk
http://www.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/fireems-safety-health-and-5

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Three: “Dynamic Management of Risk during Combat Fire Engagement”
http://www.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/fireems-safety-health-and-8

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Four: “History Repeating Events”
http://www.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/fireems-safety-health-and-9


Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Five: “From Waldbaum’s to Hackensack- Worcester to Charleston; Legacies for Operational Safety”
http://www.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/fireems-safety-health-and-12

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Six: “Situations, Size-Up, Actions and Entertainment”
http://www.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/fireems-safety-health-and-15

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Seven; “The Courage to be Safe”
http://www.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/fireems-safety-health-and-17

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Eight + 193; “There is No Day of Rest”
http://www.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/fireems-safety-health-and-20

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Seven; “The Courage to be Safe”

No comments

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Seven; “The Courage to be Safe” Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health and Survival Are Your Responsibility

Today is June 20th, the seventh day in the Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week. This is the culminating day of what hopefully has been an opportune week to dedicate time and energies to focus on the mission critical and life sustaining functional areas of our fire and EMS profession.

The theme this year was Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health and Survival Are Your Responsibility and encouraged chiefs and fire/EMS personnel to focus on what they personally could do to manage risk and enhance their health and safety. This year’s theme reflected the need for personal responsibility and accountability within a strong safety culture.

There were recommended activities and materials provide that would incorporate four key areas where standard operating procedures, policies and initiatives—along with the training and enforcement that support them—can limit fire/EMS personnel’s risk of injury or death.

These focus areas consisted of;

Safety: Emergency Driving (enough is enough—end senseless death)
• Lower speeds—stop racing to the scene. Drive safely and arrive alive to help others.
• Utilize seat belts—never drive or ride without them.
• Stop at every intersection—look in all directions and then proceed in a safe manner.

Health: Fire Fighter Heart Disease and Cancer Education and Prevention
• Don’t smoke or use tobacco products.
• Get active.• Eat a heart-healthy diet.
• Maintain a healthy weight.
• Get regular health screenings.

Survival: Structural Size-Up and Situational Awareness
• Keep apprised of different types of building materials and construction used in your community.
• Develop a comprehensive size-up checklist.
• Always complete a 360° walk of the structure to collect valuable, operational decision-making information.
• Learn the practice of reading smoke.
• Be familiar with the accepted rules of engagement.
• Learn your accountability system and use it.
• Master your tools and equipment.
• Remain calm and concentrate.

Chiefs: Be the Leader in Safety
• Become personally engaged in safety and make it part of your strategic vision for the department.
• Be willing to make the tough decisions regarding safety policies and practices and their implementation.
• Hold members of the organization accountable for their safety and the safety of those with whom they work.
• Ensure that resources are available to accomplish activities safely and effectively.

The IAFC and IAFF encouraged all fire/EMS departments to devote the period of this week to;
• review safety policies,
• evaluating the progress of existing initiatives and
• discussing health and fitness.
• Fire/EMS departments were encouraged to make a concerted effort during the week to correct safety deficiencies and
• provide training as needed.

The Consciences Observer or Activist
So the operative question this Saturday is this: What did you do, participate in, contribute, join in, share, lead, promote, instruct, present, facilitate, help, assist, aid, or neglect, disregard, undermine, abuse, challenge, demoralize, undercut, damage, torpedo, circumvent, or avoid?

A considerable and tangible effort was made by most organizations, departments and staff I had the opportunity to talk to around the nation this week. It was clearly evident that a majority of online fire service trade magazines, journals, services, blogs and eMedia, social + networking communities also dedicated editorial attention and perspectives towards the themes and focus of Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival week.

With that being said, it also doesn’t take long to also see what I alluded to in the, “what did you do this week question?”. Many organizations, personnel and leaders specifically preferred, NOT to participate or did so under a thin veil of apparent involvement. To think otherwise, would be naive and ignorant. For let us not forget, these are the times in which the culture of suppression is contending with the culture of safety…..But, I digress; we’ll leave that alone for the time being.

Were you an active participant, engaged and contributing or were you the consciences observer, passively or aggressively sitting on the sidelines of the apparatus floor? Campaigner or militant; advocate or protester? Where do you stand?I began this discussion today with one distinct, poignant contemplation and value; Do YOU have the Courage to be Safe? The resonating theme that challenged all of us and carried the banner of the week was; Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health and Survival Are Your Responsibility. YOUR Responsibility-Not someone else’s, but your; responsibility, task, job, duty, charge, accountability conscientiousness, and obligation.

Taking it to the Streets
The adage that the fire service has more recently adopted states; “There are no “routine calls”; referring to the safety consciousness that all responding companies should endeavor to consider when responding to an incident

.• We have a tendency to treat a lot of things as equal and very routine based upon the periodicity and frequency of the alarm type and the typical, inconsequential nature of the incident outcome or the commonality of the fire and suppression efforts that routinely are employed by our operating companies.
• We seem to do a lot of things at times out of common practice and repetition, you know; “We’ve always done it that way….” syndrome.
• There’s a resonating theme that is making its way around the fire service dealing with an apparent “culture of extinguishment” and the suggested and inaccurately described “diametrically opposing” fire service safety culture promoted by those on the “Dark Side”
• There’s the daily experience, expectations, and our comfort zone;
• We’re pretty good at what we do-Regularly….
• We develop profound habits and methods…
• We treat a lot of things as equal in many respects…

• We’ve grown accustomed to certain operational modes..
• We don’t really think anything is going to happen to us, certainly nothing so adverse that I don’t go home after the call.
• Nothing is going to happen to YOU; it happens to someone else….
• BUT to everyone else-YOU are the other Guy!

On any give day, at any give alarm, the dynamics around us at times may be in or out of our direct control. We may not be able to see what the cards have in store for us, BUT we must ensure we use every fragment of training, fortitude, knowled
ge, skills, courage, bravery, insights, luck and sometimes (other divine) intervention to get us through. We must have the fortitude and courage to be both safety conscious and measured in the performance of our sworn duties while maintaining the appropriate balance of risk and bravery.

The demands and requirements of modern firefighting will continue to require the placement of personnel within situations and buildings that carry risk, uncertainty and inherent danger. As a result, risk management must become fluid and integrate all personnel. We must manage dynamic risks with a balanced approach of effective assessment, analysis and probability within command decision making that results in safety conscious strategies and tactics.

Stop and reflect today, where do you stand? What are your true beliefs and convictions in regards to the developing safety culture that is being forged and institutionalized within our fire service? Are your professing one thing, but implementing or allowing another circumstance?

Think about the following and attach you own significance or connotation;
• The Courage to be Safe
• Setting the Example
• Doing the Right Thing, at the Right Time for the Right Reason
• Courage to do the right thing in order to protect yourself and other firefighters
• Fortitude & Limitations
• Consequences of Actions
• Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
• Balanced Risk Management
• Command Presence & Leadership
• Role & Responsibility
• Life and Death-REALITY
• Measured counteracts Aggressive
• Be Measured in your suppression assignments and task duties
• Know When to Alter the Mode and When the Risk Profile is Appropriate
• Understand the Calculated Risks- And When they are Appropriate
• Know YOUR Companies/ Teams Limitations & Capabilities

• Don’t Over Extend – Don’t Push the Envelope-Right Time/Cause
• Learn from the Past (HRE)
• Don’t Fall under The “Superman Syndrome”
• Courage to Improve our Culture…

The Courage to be Safe….if not now….When?
Take a look at the video
HERE, you’ll hopefully understand…..
Remember: “ Building Knowledge = Firefighter Safety”

Take the time to check out these excellent programs and initiatives from the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation and the Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives Program; HERE

The Courage to Be Safe SM Program
Firefighters must have the courage to face a multitude of risks in order to save lives and protect their communities. Their courage allows them to willingly risk their own lives so that others can be saved. A different type of courage is required to stay safe in potentially dangerous situations, avoiding needless risks and tragic consequences.

This provocative and moving presentation is designed to change the culture of accepting the loss of firefighters as a normal occurrence. Building on the untold story of LODD survivors, it reveals how family members must live with the consequences of a firefighter death and provides a focus on the need for firefighters and officers to change fundamental attitudes and behaviors in order to prevent line of duty deaths. The central theme promotes the courage to do the right thing in order to protect yourself and other firefighters and ensure that “Everyone Goes Home” at the end of the day.

Courage to Be SafeSM consists of a PowerPoint presentation on a CD, as well as an instructor guide and sample handout materials. The CD includes embedded video clips of fire service leaders and excerpts of the emotional presentation made at FDIC-2005 by Reverend Bevon Smith, father of Paul Smith, a firefighter who in died in the line of duty in 1989.

The Safety Through Leadership Program
In the summer of 2006, National Fallen Firefighters Foundation Executive Director Ron Siarnicki and the Everyone Goes Home® Life Safety Initiatives (LSI) Team attended a meeting in San Diego of the National Wildland Coordinating Group to look at the leadership material the NWCG had developed for the Wildland community. The LSI Team crafted a proposal to develop a course for the structural firefighter based on the NWCG model.

Shortly thereafter, Lieutenant Tony McDowell, company officers’ section of the Virginia Fire Chiefs Association, contacted the LSI Team seeking help to develop a leadership course that would embody the 16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives. The VFCA was invited to collaborate with the LSI Team in the development of a leadership program that would include relevant aspects of the NWCG model and embody the 16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives.

In order to fully understand the NWCG L-380 Leadership sequence, the Everyone Goes Home® Program sent two safety officers, one from Montgomery County Fire Rescue Service and the other from the Virginia Beach Fire Department, to the San Diego Fire Department to participate an L-380 course being conducted there. The two officers reported the experience as life-changing in terms of what they learned and what they came to believe about the linkage between firefighter safety and leadership.

The pilot was presented in June (2007) at the University of Richmond’s Jepson School of Business, to thirty students from across the state of Virginia and five others who had seen the course advertised on the VFCA website and applied. Over one hundred students applied for the course. By any measure, the Safety Through Leadership was a phenomenal success.

Over the next year, FLSI course developers carefully evaluated the material from Virginia with an eye toward developing a national curriculum. While most of the format of the VFCA was retained (including material from the L-380 course) new material was developed and added to the national model curriculum.

A call was put out in the winter of 2008 for thirty students to come to the National Fire Academy. Quickly, all the seats were spoken for, including the return of three who had attended the Virginia pilot. The Train-the-Trainer program commenced on June 24-27, 2008 on the campus of the National Fire Academy in Emmitsburg, Md.

Safety Through Leadership focuses on the company officer and his or her attitude toward the safety of firefighters within their span of authority.
It is a role-play based curriculum which begins with several cooperative exercises, including the naming of the fire department under which all activities will proceed for the duration of the training program.

Five modules regarding safety and leadership were presented to the students, ranging from effective supervisory practices to threat and error management (utilizing the model of crew resource management).The modules are meant to make the program both easy to deliver (one a month, for example) and scalable to the particular audience. A series of excellent video role-plays were developed to reinforce discussions.

The central goal of the Safety Through Leadership program is to create an emotional impact within company officers so they are encouraged to reflect on their own leadership styles and create changes always with a mindset toward safety.Safety Through Leadership is not meant to replace other leadership programs that may be in place. Rather, it is a value-added approach that requires company officers and other supervisors to set the example of safety in every behavior they model for the firefighters they supervise.

This means that safety and leadership are linked not only on the fireground (where we would expect it) but also in training and in the long hours of “everyday living” in the station.• The Train-the-Trainer, therefore, spent a good deal of
time reviewing and reinforcing the 16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives so that the trainers will become living ambassadors for Everyone Goes Home®.

Safety Through Leadership is a program appropriate at both the station-level and to broader audiences such as regional or state training opportunities.
It can be delivered as a four day academy, or it can be sequentially delivered via the modules.

• The bottom line is that company officers hold the key to modeling a safety attitude and for doing everything they can to make sure their firefighters go home safe after every call.

The Safety Through Leadership program is one way this burden can be lightened, and this responsibility wholeheartedly endorsed.

If you would like more information about Safety Through Leadership, please contact the Everyone Goes Home® program directly via the website at www.everyonegoeshome.com

End Note: I had the profound privilege to participate with an exceptional cadre of national instructors in the Safety Through Leadership Train-the-Trainer program in 2008 at the National Fire Academy in Emmitsburg, Md. I can attest that this program and content will stimulate, enlighten and inspire you to comprehend and embrace the values of safety within the modern fire and emergency services. Take the time to check it out.

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Four: “History Repeating Events”

No comments

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week: Day Four: “History Repeating Events”

Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health and Survival Are Your Responsibility

Today is June 17th, the fourth day in the Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week. To many of you, today is unlike so many other days. Whether it’s going on or off-shift, going to your “day” job; common rituals and activities define our day and are a part of your typical schedule or routine, activities, occupation, trade, leisure or everyday jobs.

On any given day, we expect some fairly simple and basic things; Simple and basic from a firefighter’s perspective that is. Let’s clearly put this discussion into firefighter terms and context. We hope that we have a busy day, for the most part; that the alarms and incidents allow us to practice our skills and do what we do best. Deep down inside, we also hope that we have a good “job” come in that allows us to work the job, to fight the fight and put into practice all that we train and prepare to do, we the bell hits and we are called to duty.

Not that we hope or wish undue miss-fortune, distress or sorrow on anyone, but, IF a fire is going to happen, let it happen on my shift, my tour or while I’m at the firehouse and able to make the first-due. It’s a pretty fundamental hierarchy of need, and it’s what makes us tick at times. Because of who we are and what we do. Right?

But today is much more than that. June 17th marks the anniversary of two significant fire service incidents that resonate with the values, doctrine and philosophy that define the principles of Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week.

Both of these incidents resulted in firefighter line-of-duty deaths at seemingly routine fires, in relatively ordinary structures and occupancies, each with unusual building construction features and conditions that would contribute to the adverse circumstances of the incident operations, and ultimately contribute to the LODD events.

Hotel Vendome Fire-1972
On June 17th, 1972, a typical routine day was unfolding for the Jakes in the Boston Fire Department. At 14:35 hours, Box 1571 was received at Boston Fire Alarm Office. It would be the first of four alarms required to extinguish an intense fire at the former Hotel Vendome on Commonwealth Avenue at Dartmouth Street, City of Boston, Massachusetts. It took nearly three hours to contain the blaze. The four alarm fire required a compliment of 16 engine companies, 5 ladder companies, 2 aerial towers and 1 heavy rescue company, with all companies operating with a full complement of personnel staffing.

Following extensive and strenuous suppression operations, the BFD commenced routine overhaul operation. Then, at 17:28 hours, without warning, all five floors of a 40 by 45 foot section southeast corner of the building collapsed, burying a ladder truck and 17 firefighters beneath a two-story pile of brick, mortar, plaster, wood and debris.

More than any other event in the three hundred year history of the Boston Fire Department, the Vendome tragedy exemplifies the risk intrinsic to the firefighting profession and the accompanying courage required in the performance of duty. Nine firefighters were killed on that day, eight more injured; eight women widowed, twenty-five children lost their fathers; a shocked city mourned before the sympathetic eyes of the entire nation.

The Hotel Vendome fire and the Nine Line-of-duty deaths, two Company Officers and seven firefighters
• Lieutenant THOMAS J. CARROLL, E-32.
• Lieutenant JOHN E. HANBURY, JR., L-13.
• Firefighter THOMAS W. BECKWITH, E-32.
• Firefighter JOSEPH E. BOUCHER, JR., E-22.
• Firefighter CHARLES E. DOLAN, L-13.
• Firefighter JOHN E. JAMESON, E-22.
• Firefighter RICHARD B. MAGEE, E-33.
• Firefighter PAUL J. MURPHY, E-32.
• Firefighter JOSEPH P. SANIUK, L-13.

Built in 1871 and massively expanded in 1881, the Hotel Vendome was a luxury hotel located in Boston’s Back Bay, just north of Copley Square. During the 1960s, the Vendome suffered four small fires. In 1971, the year of the original building’s centennial, the Vendome was purchased. The new owners opened a restaurant called Cafe Vendome on the first floor, and began renovating the remaining hotel into condominiums and a shopping mall.

Although the cause of the original fire was not known, the subsequent collapse was attributed to the failure of an overloaded seven-inch steel column whose support had been weakened when a new duct had been cut beneath it, exacerbated by the extra weight of water used to fight the fire on the upper floors.

References and Documents
• Boston Fire Department, HERE
• Vendome, Wikipedia, HERE
• Building Photos and the Firefighter’s Memorial, HERE
• Gendisasters, Historical Perspective, HERE
• Boston Globe, HERE
• Boston FD Ladder 15, HERE

FDNY Father’s Day Fire-2001
The relative calm of a quiet Sunday, Father’s Day, June 17th , 2001 was broken at 14:19 hours with a phone call to the FDNY Queens Central Office reporting a fire at 12-22 Astoria Blvd, in the Astoria Section of Queens, New York. For almost 80 years, the Long Island General Supply store has been a fixture in the Long Island City section of Queens serving local contractors and residents with all of their hardware needs. Unfortunately, that included propane tanks and other flammable liquids.

Two structures were involved in this incident. Both buildings were interconnected on the first floors as well as the cellars.

• Both structures were built prior to 1930 of ordinary (Type III) construction, and were two stories in height, each with a full cellar.
• Building 1 measured 2035 square feet and was triangular in shape.
• Building 2 measured 1102 square feet and was rectangular in shape.
• Building 1 and Building 2 shared a common or party wall and were interconnected on the first floor and the cellar.Building to building access in the cellar was through a fire door. The fire door was blocked open to allow free movement between the cellars which were used for storage. The hardware stored occupied the first floor and cellars of both buildings. Building 1 had two apartments on the second floor.

Building 2 had an office and storage space on the second floor. Note: A third uninvolved building was attached to the west side of Building 2. The flat roof system sheathing consisted of 5/8-inch plywood covered by felt paper and rubber roof membrane. The foundation was constructed out of stone and mortar. The support system was a combination of steel masonry posts/lolly columns and wooden support beams.

FDNY Units arrived within 5 minutes of the dispatch and gave the signal for a working fire. Fire fighters were making good progress but at 14:48 hours something went terribly wrong. Witnesses on the scene report hearing a small explosion followed by a huge blast. The shock wave from the blast blew d
own every fire fighter on the street and knocked down the exposure 1 wall onto the sidewalk, right on top of fire fighters venting the building.

As members started sifting through the rubble, the chief ordered a second alarm followed almost immediately by a fourth alarm when a radio transmission was received from FF Brian Fahey from Rescue 4. He was in the basement under tons of collapsed material.

“I’m trapped in the basement by the stairs. Come get me.” This was a battle cry to everyone on the scene. Every capable member frantically began removing debris to try and get to Brian and the others. The chief ordered more help. Numerous special calls were made.

There were 144 pieces of apparatus at the scene: 46 engines, 33 ladders, 16 battalion chiefs, 2 deputy chiefs, all 5 rescues, 7 squads, and many more. In fact, with the exception of the fire boats, the JFK hose wagon, the Decon unit, and the thawing units, every type of special unit was at the scene.

Even with the vast resources of the Department, the task took several hours. The members that were on the sidewalk were quickly recovered.
• Fire fighters Harry Ford (R4) and John Downing (L163) were removed in traumatic arrest and brought to Elmhurst Hospital were they succumbed from their injuries.
• Back at the scene members still were trying to get to Brian while others were trying to put out the smoky fire. The battle went through the afternoon and into the evening.
• The fire was being fueled by some of the flammables in the building.
• After about four hours they finally reached the basement, but again, it was too late. FDNY Firefighter Brian died in the Line-of-duty.

Subsequent investigations revealed that two local kids were in the rear yard of the building when unbeknownst to them they knocked over a can of gasoline. The gasoline ran under the rear door, into the basement eventually finding an ignition source in the form of the water heater.

When the water heater kicked in, it ignited the gasoline. As fire fighters began working in the building the fire caused the explosion of a large propane tank illegally stored in the basement. The resulting blast leveled the building and caused what will be forever known as the worst Father’s Day in FDNY’s history. (Excerpt of the event description published in www.fdnewyork.com).

The supreme sacrifice was made that day by;
• FDNY Firefighter Harry S. Ford, Rescue Co.4
• FDNY Firefighter Brain D. Fahey, Rescue Co. 4
• FDNY Firefighter John Downing, Ladder Co. 163

Take the time to read the NIOSH Report, and learn the lessons from that event

References
NIOSH Report F2001-23, HERE
FDNEWYORK, HERE
Steve Spak, Photos, HERE
The Late, FDNY Firefighter Andy Fredrick’s Account, HERE
Online Service Accounts and Coverage, HERE
Buffalo, NY FD North Division Street Explosion, HERE, HERE and HERE

Note: The Buffalo, NY, Fire Department experienced a similar event on December 27, 1983 in North Division Street Fire and Explosion that resulted in five firefighter line-of-duty deaths.

As BFD firefighters arrived at the scene of a reported propane leak in a three-story radiator warehouse (Type III ordinary construction), a massive explosion occurred, killing five firefighters instantly and injuring nine others, three of them critically. The force of the blast blew BFD Ladder 5′s tiller aerial 35 feet across the street into the front yard of a dwelling. BFD Engine 1′s pumper was also blown across the street with the captain and driver pinned in the cab with burning debris all around them. Engine 32′s engine was blown up against a warehouse across a side street and covered with rubble.

Two civilians were also killed and another 60 to 70 were injured. While operating at the rescue effort, another 19 firefighters were injured. The blast and ensuing fire ignited 14 residences and damaged as many as 130 buildings over a four block area. The explosion occurred when an employee was moving an illegal 500-lb. propane tank with a forklift truck and dropped it, breaking off a valve. The gas leaked out, found an ignition source, and the explosion occurred. Killed in the line of duty were all assigned to Buffalo FD Ladder Company 5; F/F Michael Austin, F/F Michael Catanzaro, F/F Matthew Colpoys, F/F James Lickfield and F/F Anthony Waszkielewicz.

Taking it to the Streets
The adage that the fire service has more recently adopted states; “There are no “routine calls”; referring to the safety consciousness that all responding companies should endeavor to consider when responding to an incident, that all too often appears; upon our arrival to be routine in every sense of the word. Whether it’s an alarm system activation, a report of food on the stove, a report of a smoke detector alarming or a report of a gas odor or leak, we have a tendency to treat a lot of things as equal and very routine based upon the periodicity and frequency of the alarm type and the typical, inconsequential nature of the incident outcome or the commonality of the fire and suppression efforts that routinely are employed by our operating companies.

We seem to do a lot of things at times out of common practice and repetition, you know; “We’ve always done it that way…” syndrome. There’s a resonating theme that is making its way around the fire service dealing with an apparent “culture of extinguishment” and the suggested and inaccurately described “diametrically opposing” fire service safety culture promoted by those on the “Dark Side”

The daily experience, expectations, our comfort zone;
• We’re pretty good at what we do-Regularly….
• We develop profound habits and methods…
• We treat a lot of things as equal in many respects…
• We’ve grown accustomed to certain operational modes..
• We don’t really think anything is going to happen to us, certainly nothing so adverse that I don’t go home after the call.

Nothing is going to happen to YOU; it happens to someone else….
BUT to everyone else-YOU are the other Guy!

On any give day, at any give alarm, the dynamics around us at times may be in or out of our direct control. We may not be able to see what the cards have in store for us, BUT we must ensure we use every fragment of training, fortitude, knowledge, skills, courage, bravery, insights, luck and sometimes (other divine) intervention to get us through.

Take the time today or this evening to visit and download selective reports from the NIOSH Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program. The lessons learned from these reports and the important recommendations that are written as a direct result of the supreme sacrifices made by our brother and sister firefighters that died in the line of duty speaks volumes. In reality, the words written in these reports are the words from our fallen, they convey the messages to correct deficiencies, close gaps and increase and enhance are
as of operations, training, education, administration, management, supervision, resources, equipment, protocols, preparedness, perspectives, culture and values.

When you look over these events over the years, it doesn’t take long to identify that many LODD events share similarities, and that specific incident events, deficiencies, outcomes and recommendations are identical in every way, except for the fire department name and geographical location. In other words, we have History Repeating Events (HRE). Events that resonate with common issues, apparent and contributing causes and operational factors that share legacy issues that the fire service fails to identify, relate to and implement. In other words, we fail a times to learn from the past, or we make a deliberate chose to ignore those lessons due to other internal or external influences, pressures, authority, beliefs, values or viewpoints. We make choices and we determine our direction, path and destiny.

History repeating itself is nothing new to society, it is apparent and self revealing in much of written history and recorded legacies, and as defined by a popular quote states; “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

An interesting series of quotes from noted historian Gerda Lerner states the following;
“What we do about history matters. The often repeated saying that those who forget the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them has a lot of truth in it. But what are ‘the lessons of history’? The very attempt at definition furnishes ground for new conflicts. History is not a recipe book; past events are never replicated in the present in quite the same way. Historical events are infinitely variable and their interpretations are a constantly shifting process. There are no certainties to be found in the past.”

She goes on to state; “We can learn from history how past generations thought and acted, how they responded to the demands of their time and how they solved their problems. We can learn by analogy, not by example, for our circumstances will always be different than theirs were. The main thing history can teach us is that human actions have consequences and that certain choices, once made, cannot be undone. They foreclose the possibility of making other choices and thus they determine future events.”

We must learn for the part, so that we limit or eradicate the opportunity for History Repeating events aligning themselves again and providing emergency incident circumstances to lead to another line-of-duty death, injuries or large loss incident.

History Repeating Events share may common and familiar themes. Research exemplifies the following shared commonality causes related to History Repeating Events;
• A lack of pre-incident planning
• Ineffective or lack of risk management
• No Incident action plan• Free-lancing
• Inadequate Training/Skills• Faulted Strategies and/or Tactics
• Deficient Resources/staffing
• Lack of Accountability• Insufficient Fire Suppression versus Fire Loading affect• Ineffective or non-existent Supervisory oversight
• No effective span of control / management
• Not understanding Building Construction
• Not understanding Structural Assemblies and Systems
• Not understanding Construction & Occupancy factors• Not understanding Engineered Building Systems and relationship to Tactics
• Lacking understanding of Fire Behavior and Fire Dynamics
• Ineffective Company level supervision
• Lack of Situational Awareness• Command Dysfunction
• Failure to implement periodic in-situ reassessments

Think about your actions, think about what you can do to make a difference or to alter or change the course of a situation. We sometimes have a greater hand in destiny and how the cards are dealt than we think. Take a look and discuss the HRE causal factors listed above, share these with you officers, with you company level personnel or the department as a whole. Pose the question, “What do these mean to you?” See what the different feedback might illustrate and how they may be viewed from a different set of perspectives, generations or rank and assignments.

Safety Considerations for Operations involving Ordinary or Heavy Timber Type Construction.
In support of the two (2) incident events discussed in this article related to the Hotel Vendome and the Astoria Queens Hardware Store Explosion. Both of these structures were Type III, Ordinary Construction. This is a good opportunity for you to introduce yourself to or refresh yourself on the Safety Considerations for Operations involving Ordinary or Heavy Ti…

A comprehensive power point program is available for download from the Near Miss Reporting System web site, HERE

An accompanying narrative report and its alignment with a Near Miss Report related to a type III occupancy and incident response and close call support the power point presentation, HERE

Don’t forget, the Near Miss Reporting System, HERE, has exemplary resources, case studies, close calls and lessons to be learned and institutionalized. The same is true about the resources at the NFFF Everyone Goes Home Program, HERE and the IAFC Fire/EMS Safety week web site HERE.

Take the time to learn something about Ordinary or Heavy Timber Type Construction. As I stated earlier this week, Building Knowledge = Firefighter Safety. No more History Repeating Events!
Here’s a closing quote from the late Senator Robert F. Kennedy;“Few will have the greatness to bend history itself; but each of us can work to change a small portion of events, and in the total of all those acts will be written the history of this generation.”

Be safe, have a great tour or stay at the firehouse today or this evening. Remember this week’s message: Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health and Survival Are Your Responsibility

Building Construction, Command Risk Management and Firefighter Safety

No comments

Building Construction, Command Risk Management and Firefighter Safety; three functional domains common to the fire service, each having a profound influence and interdependent relationship to fire operations, safety and incident management. When we talk about structural fires, combat fire suppression and interior operations, the discussions tend to revolve around the issues affecting strategy and tactics, engine, truck and rescue company operations, tactical assignments, task level protocols, methods and operating procedures.

The dynamics of firefighting and the interaction within a structure during combat structural fire engagement has a correlating dependency between command and company officers; between dynamic risk assessment and management, situational awareness, building construction and firefighter survival.

The relationships of Building Construction, Command Risk Management and Firefighter Safety are interdependent and formulative to all facets of structural fire operations. These three domains and the functional areas that make up these domains must be mastered in order for any significant changes to the continuing adverse trends in firefighter line of duty death and injury rate can be substantially made within the fireground operations setting.

The mantras of building construction A variety of themes and mantras have been prompted to support various initiatives for the past 30 years related to building construction and in the support of firefighter safety improvements.

Some examples include:
Brannigan, “The Building Is the Enemy” (1971)
Dunn, “No Building Is Worth the Life of a Firefighter” (1985)
Brunacini, “We will Risk” Doctrine (1985)
Brennan, “Make the Building Behave” (1995)
IAFC, “Risk Assessment & Rules of Engagement” (2001)
Goldfeder, “Everyone Goes Home” (2001)
NFFF, “Sixteen Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives” (2004)
Naum, “Building Knowledge = Firefighter Safety” (2008)

Building Knowledge = Firefighter Safety (Bk=F2S) is the mantra and axiom I began promoting in 2007 and expanded in 2008 that takes into account the true need for the fire service to have a deep seated understanding and technical proficiencies not only in building construction, but the allied functional areas as defined in the core fundamentals.

If the fire service can significantly increase proficiencies in building knowledge and equate that to other fundamental operational aspects in structural fire operations, then there would be a direct enhancement to firefighter safety, through injury and LODD reduction. If we understand buildings, occupancies and constructions, and balance this with our understanding of fire dynamics and orchestrate it with appropriate strategies, tactics and command management, then we made the new safety equation work; Building Knowledge = Firefighter Safety (Bk=F2S). We’ll discuss this axiom further in the near future.

Chief Alan Brunacini, in his “We will Risk” Doctrine (1985) wrote, “We will risk our lives a lot, in a highly calculated and controlled manner, to protect a savable human life; we will risk our lives a little, in a highly calculated and controlled manner, to protect savable property. We will not risk our lives at all to protect lives or property that is already lost.” The simplicity of this doctrine prompted a significant change in perspective within the fire service.

Long held beliefs, established and pragmatic operational strategies and tactics began to be questioned; risk, benefit, safety, survivability, assessment, value and firefighter injury and LODD reduction were being introduced into the fireground operational formula related to structure fires and the buildings and occupancies that defined them.

When coupled with the NFFF Firefighter Life Safety Initiative #3 — Focus greater attention on the integration of risk management with incident management at all levels, including strategic, tactical, and planning responsibilities — we can optimistically begin to identify with the necessary areas to focus on training, skill development and operational competencies.

Situational awareness and risk assessment Situation Awareness related to Building Construction, Command Risk Management and Firefighter Safety is another mission critical element. Situation Awareness (SA) is the perception of environmental elements within a volume of time and space, the comprehension of their meaning, and the projection of their status in the near future.
It is also a field of study concerned with perception of the environment critical to decision-makers in complex, dynamic situations and incidents. Both the 2006 and 2007 Firefighter Near-Miss Reporting System Annual Reports identified a lack of situational awareness as the highest contributing factor to near misses reported.

Situation Awareness involves being aware of what is happening around you at an incident scene to understand how information, events, and your own actions will impact operational goals and incident objectives, both now and in the near future.

Lacking SA or having inadequate SA has been identified as one of the primary factors in accidents attributed to human error (Hartel, Smith, & Prince, 1991) (Nullmeyer, Stella, Montijo, & Harden, 2005). Situation Awareness becomes especially important in the structural fire suppression and firefighter domains where the information flow can be quite high and poor decisions can lead to serious consequences.Dynamic Risk Assessment is commonly used to describe a process of risk assessment being carried out in a changing or evolving environment, where what is being assessed is developing as the process itself is being undertaken. This is further problematical for the Incident Commander when confronted with competing or conflicting incident priorities, demands or distractions before a complete appreciation of all mission critical or essential information and data has been obtained. The dynamic management of risk is all about effective, informed and decisive decision making during all phases of an incident at a structural fire.

To the Incident Commander, fire officer or firefighter, knowing what’s going on around you, in and around the building structure and understanding the consequences of building, construction, assembly, fire load and fire development and growth is mission critical to incident stabilization and mitigation and profoundly crucial in terms of personnel safety.

The integration of Situational Awareness and Dynamic Risk Assessment related to the building and occupancy is a mission critical element in managing structural fires and in the strategic command management and company level tactical operations as we go forward into the next decade. Traditional phased incident scene size-up and monitoring is antiquated and no longer appropriate or applicable to modern fire service operations.

Situational awareness is a combination of attitudes, previously learned knowledge and new information gained from the incident scene and environment that enables the strategic commanders, decision-makers and tactical companies to gather the information they need to make effective decisions that will keep their firefighters and resources out of harm’s way, reducing the likelihood of adverse or detrimental effects.

According to a 1998 published Tri Data Corporation repor
t, “Situational Awareness is one of the most difficult skills to master and is a weakness in the fire community. The report goes on to state that, “The culture must change so that [personnel] are observing, thinking, and discussing the situation constantly.” It’s all about implementing effective human performance tools; perceptions versus reality, expectations versus realization, comprehension and forecasting, informed decision-making and calculated and formulated risk.

Command and company officers and firefighters MUST understand the building, the occupancy features and the inherent impact of fire within and on the structure, AND be able to identify, communicate and take actions necessary to support the incident action and battle plans, mitigate incident conditions and provide for continuous safety protection to themselves, their team, their company and the entire alarm assignment operating at the incident scene.

The defining questions you should be asking yourself are;
What do you know about building construction?
Do you have a knowledge base on fire dynamics and fire behavior?
Are you implementing situational awareness into your operations and assignments?
Are you utilizing appropriate and continuous risk assessment (RA) and analysis?
Do the risk assessment indicators influence your incident action plan AND modify it when needed?
Does firefighter safety come first?

Or does tactical “fireground entertainment” permeate your structural fire operations?

Did anyone tell you the Rules for Structural Fire Suppression and Engagement have changed? Do you comprehend the importance of this statement as it relates to your personal safety, your team, your company and your organization? Think about it.

Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week; Day-One; What’s It All About

No comments

Today is the first day of Fire and EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week. Did you know that? If so, then you’ve already kicked off a full week of focused activities for your companies and personnel within your organization or in concert with your surrounding jurisdictions and agencies. If you haven’t AND haven’t heard about this, then you need to get with the program and check out the IAFC, Safety, Health and Survival Section and the National Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival web page.
This year’s theme and focus is Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health and Survival Are Your Responsibility, encouraging all chiefs and fire/EMS personnel to focus on what they personally can do to manage risk and enhance their health and safety.This year’s theme reflects the need for personal responsibility and accountability within a strong safety culture. In case you missed it, here’s some highlights; Recommended activities and materials will incorporate four key areas where standard operating procedures, policies and initiatives—along with the training and enforcement that support them—can limit fire/EMS personnel’s risk of injury or death:
Safety:
Emergency Driving (enough is enough—end senseless death)
Lower speeds—stop racing to the scene.
Drive safely and arrive alive to help others.
Utilize seat belts—never drive or ride without them.
Stop at every intersection—look in all directions and then proceed in a safe manner.
Health:
Fire Fighter Heart Disease and Cancer Education and Prevention
Don’t smoke or use tobacco products.
Get active.
Eat a heart-healthy diet.
Maintain a healthy weight.
Get regular health screenings.
Survival:
Structural Size-Up and Situational Awareness
Keep apprised of different types of building materials and construction used in your community.
Develop a comprehensive size-up checklist.
Always complete a 360° walk of the structure to collect valuable, operational decision-making information.
Learn the practice of reading smoke.
Be familiar with the accepted rules of engagement.
Learn your accountability system and use it.
Master your tools and equipment.
Remain calm and concentrate.
Chiefs:
Be the Leader in Safety
Become personally engaged in safety and make it part of your strategic vision for the department.
Be willing to make the tough decisions regarding safety policies and practices and their implementation.
Hold members of the organization accountable for their safety and the safety of those with whom they work.
Ensure that resources are available to accomplish activities safely and effectively.
The IAFC Safety, Health and Survival Section encourage all fire/EMS departments to devote this week to reviewing safety policies, evaluating the progress of existing initiatives and discussing health and fitness. Fire/EMS departments should make a concerted effort during the week to correct safety deficiencies and to provide training as needed. An entire week is provided to ensure that each shift and volunteer duty crew can spend one day focusing on fire fighter safety, health and survival.
Here are some significant areas that are a MUST for anyone who is serious about safety, health and survival in their organization and for their personnel. I know many of you frequently visit and utilize these web site, but or those personnel who have yet to come to identify with these sites and wealth of resources and insights they provide, there are those operation crucial resources areas;
• NFFF, Everyone Goes Home, HERE
• IAFC, National Fire and EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week web site, HERE
• IAFC Safety, Health and Survival Section, HERE
• National Near Miss Reporting Systems, HERE
• NIOSH Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program, HERE
• NFPA, HERE
• FDSOA, HERE
• ISFSI, HERE
• USFA, HERE
• NFFF, HERE
The basis for firefighter and fire and emergency services safety, health and survival is predicated and casted in this, the 21st century by the unprecedented gathering of the leadership of the American fire service that occurred on March 10 – 11, 2004 when more than 200 individuals assembled in Tampa, Florida to focus on the troubling question of how to prevent line-of-duty deaths.
Every year approximately 100 firefighters lose their lives in the line of duty in the United States; about one every 80 hours. The first ever National Fire Fighter Life Safety Summit was convened to bring the leadership of the fire service together for two days to focus all of their attention on this one critical concern.
Every identifiable segment of the fire service was represented and participated in the process.The National Fallen Firefighters Foundation hosted the Summit as the first step in a major campaign. In cooperation with the United States Fire Administration, the Foundation has established the objectives of reducing the fatality rate by 25% within 5 years and by 50% within 10 years. The purpose of the Summit was to produce an agenda of initiatives that must be addressed to reach those milestones and to gain the commitment of the fire service leadership to support and work toward their accomplishment.
iv>
The Summit marks a significant milestone, because it is the first time that a major gathering has been organized to unite all segments of the fire service behind the common goal of reducing firefighter deaths. It provided an opportunity for all of the participants to focus on the problems, jointly identify the most important issues, agree upon a set of key initiatives, and develop the commitments and coalitions that are essential to move forward with their implementation.
Take a look at some of the Summit reports HERE.
The most significant outcome from the Tampa Summit was the development and publication of the NFFF, Sixteen Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives.
Since 2004, these have become the basis from which the majority of safety efforts and initiatives are striving to be aligned from and coordinated with.
1. Define and advocate the need for a cultural change within the fire service relating to safety; incorporating leadership, management, supervision, accountability and personal responsibility.
2. Enhance the personal and organizational accountability for health and safety throughout the fire service.
3. Focus greater attention on the integration of risk management with incident management at all levels, including strategic, tactical, and planning responsibilities.
4. All firefighters must be empowered to stop unsafe practices.
5. Develop and implement national standards for training, qualifications, and certification (including regular recertification) that are equally applicable to all firefighters based on the duties they are expected to perform.
6. Develop and implement national medical and physical fitness standards that are equally applicable to all firefighters, based on the duties they are expected to perform.
7. Create a national research agenda and data collection system that relates to the initiatives.
8. Utilize available technology wherever it can produce higher levels of health and safety.
9. Thoroughly investigate all firefighter fatalities, injuries, and near misses.
10. Grant programs should support the implementation of safe practices and/or mandate safe practices as an eligibility requirement.
11. National standards for emergency response policies and procedures should be developed and championed.
12. National protocols for response to violent incidents should be developed and championed.
13. Firefighters and their families must have access to counseling and psychological support.
14. Public education must receive more resources and be championed as a critical fire and life safety program.
15. Advocacy must be strengthened for the enforcement of codes and the installation of home fire sprinklers.
16. Safety must be a primary consideration in the design of apparatus and equipment.
Think about how each of these sixteen FF LSI relate to your organization and to YOU personally. Take the time to discuss these with your company, line offices or command officers. Share these with your firefighters and get thier imput and identify what safety, health and survival” means to them.
Sixteen Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives, Resources HERE
Check out this informative posting from Chief Billy D. Hayes, the Advocate Program Manager for the Everyone Goes Home® campaign through the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation where he has served as a State and Region IV Advocate. HERE
If you haven’t developed a program for this week’s focus, don’t worry, take a look at some of the resources and select one area to provide a concentrated focus on this week in your organization or company.Start thinking more about safety and how it relates to your department’s needs, risks and operational, administrative and managerial needs or gaps.
Remember, Fire and EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week is time period to focus a concentrated effort toward a wide latitude of safety, health and survival themes and subjects,
But in reality, we know that safety must be a central theme in our fire service culture and manifest itself into every part of daily efforts, operations and tasks.
Check out these Firefighter Nation Groups and join if you haven’t done so. Stay Informed-Get Active…..

Engineered Lumber ID Program: Enhancing Firefighter Safety, One Step at a Time

No comments

The City of Greencastle, Indiana and the Greencastle Fire Department recently enacted and approved an Engineered Lumber ID Program consisting of a sticker that is used for quick recognization of potential Collapse Dangers associated with Engineered Lumber constructed buildings. The sticker is placed on every electrical meter of all residential & commercial buildings with Engineered Lumber construction built after May 13th 2008.

The news release states that; the use of this type of lumber in building construction presents a great danger to firefighting personnel when those structures are involved in fire conditions. By design, the Engineered Lumber in floor and roof assemblies will collapse, without warning, after being exposed to heat or flame contact for a very short period of time.
Because of the inherent danger firefighters must face while operating within these buildings, an Engineered Lumber Identification Program (ELIP) has been instituted to alert personnel of the danger prior to beginning fire suppression operations.

The Engineered Lumber Identification Program is intended to alert the members of the Greencastle Fire Department with pertinent pre-plan information before firefighting forces are committed to an interior attack. The sticker is unobtrusive and is placed directly on a meter box, for example, and alerts the FD if either the floor joists and/or the trusses are made of and Engineered Lumber System and materials. The fire officers are already checking the utility boxes on all fires as part of their initial size-up. The ELIP shall be an ongoing program applied to all residential & commercial buildings inspected by the Greencastle Fire Department.

ORDINANCE 2008 – 4 states; AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING A REFLECTIVE SYMBOL ON STRUCTURES USING ENGINEERED LUMBER

WHEREAS, many new building structures currently use engineered lumber in their construction;
WHEREAS, some types of engineered lumber burn at a rate faster that other types of lumber; and
WHEREAS, in fighting fires, it would be helpful to know the types of materials used in the construction of a structure.

NOW THEREFORE be it ordained by the Common Council of the City of Greencastle as follows:
1. Definitions:
a. Engineered Lumber shall mean prefabricated I-joists, truss joists, and truss rafters, and laminated beams and studs.
b. Structure shall mean primary, secondary and accessory structures as defined in the Greencastle Zoning Code that have electrical meters that serve the structure.
2. All structures constructed with engineered lumber after the effective date of this ordinance must have a reflective symbol affixed to each electrical meter serving the structure.
3. The reflective symbol shall be in the form of a sticker, issued by the City of Greencastle that states that the structure is constructed with engineered lumber
4. Any person violating this ordinance by refusing to use the reflective symbol or by removing the reflective symbol shall be subject to a fine in an amount of $25.00 per violation. Each day that a violation occurs shall constitute a separate violation, subject to a separate fine.
5. The owner of any structure that was constructed with engineered lumber prior to the effective date of this ordinance is requested to place the reflective symbol on the electrical meter serving the structure on a voluntary basis.

This is another great example how local level insights, actions and legislation can go a long way in supporting fire service operational challanges as they relate to building construction systems, methodologies and materials. Remember, We can certainly work diligently AND cooperativley with local government officials to enhance incident operations and make our jobs safety, one step at a time….

For additional information on the Fire Department’s efforts in Greencastle, IN contact Lt. John Shafer, Lieutenant/Training Officer HERE.

For additonal information on other efforts that have been instituted nationally in other jurisdictions, check out a previous posting of mine on Truss Systems Placards For Firefighter Safety from Across the United States, HERE. It will provide you with a number of examples and links of different placarding and signage systems across the United States.

An invaluable free on-line training program on Structural Stability of Engineered Lumber in Fire Conditions – is available from UL, check HERE for further information.

The 2006 NIOSH LODD Report HERE

http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAAHfApvOOOB_WlESfHfM9b00EaB5iqTOgDk0j1naLLWLm1Zzi26PadOk4bizFlnXp0gjGbZcarsat7UvD3HaFsuw-2vaDRU4jvB-4bl6CShoRiGIXXgktu6oKRd9LPzue3kQ9IEI7QLcubbLE4uzHggz13WUmC2PVdgWMHuNfTs8S3FlAiJD61LtBEJFsu73V3exjvS8UQyGrwegQ0F6pNATji_BLUNlbkitmwbdJGs3E%26sigh%3Dt1M9yKhymImXDY5PA7jjnj1LFeE%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3D70eb3fe5759f7438%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3Dyo5ryvO2YDc2ybBAiqUIbIIA9Ro&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3Den
Video On the New Program

Superman,Ironman,Batman,Fireman…Human

No comments

http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAADjB7cieHmVEItu-JNF4-KJBcA4zqsHLz_0c0BzxGZS1Uf5l_zz3aNogSkNarHrnocNyM3HbgGbTHrdekArH9XKTZj0sazYVUCEPeXDKakBekODe2hifbcppqFcGM3rnWsTWwq8CC7Wc-OQI76rJLVsh6Lx6mlEUCFxScTBGK1UDmWDq0vkbAoUtvSNNqoBjAKK6r0WIqvz4ARqtcnboJQPUtUNrZzAMn7dKiMqXBX_0%26sigh%3Dtx2NPlGksa1VWImTop7oyy9Peko%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3Df9218087dd720d16%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3DHzYrlHpFO5IbvUktWTzlTeISQtQ&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3Den

Superman, Ironman, Batman, Fireman, Human…We have a tendency- at times to momentarily lapse in recognizing we “Fireman” (and this is related to all gender of firefighters) are Human. Everyday, firefighters throughout America and the world perform extraordinary feats of bravery and heroism, much of it unheralded, unnoticed and underappreciated. It’s part of our job, it’s what we do, after all, we are fireman (firefighters).

We know. Our companies know, and more importantly our “families” know; who we are and what we do. We perform the job that we swore an oath to uphold, we learned of the traditions of the service that we came to embrace; we learned our responsibilities, our job and the measures that sometimes need to be taken.

There has been plenty of banter over the past few weeks related to the diversity of conventional wisdom related to what a firefighter is made of, the mettle that separate those that choose the virtues of suppression versus those that profess a safer cultural demeanor.

We are all firefighters in the truest sense of the word when we choose to wear the badge; to donn our protective equipment and step off the apparatus and into a burning structure in order to undertake the measures and demands required of us; at that moment, at that time and place and under the circumstances that will clearly dictate the path of our destiny, duty, courage, honor and fortitude.

Do the Job, push the envelope; for the right reasons, for the right cause and the most noblest of circumstances. Do it for the right reasons-BUT don’t do it for the entertainment. Accept personal accountability and responsibility. Understand your limitations.

Remember, it is about the public we serve AND our “families”. Take a moment to listen to the words in the NFFF, EGH program video. Think about your accountability, responsibility and safety, while doing The Best Job in the world.

We are Fireman and yes at times we are Superman, but above all, we are still Human. Stay safe to fight that next fire, to answere that next alarm on another day….

There are NO Routine Calls

No comments

http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAAKXn9zyzXTyW6NoE_4ojujpCcNk–Eka9cj6vL_U3qHanrwscOGzfZuh08OF6qkR6kW9Jc_R_JBEG13KvX92PowsfusPMeTzVF4rVddN4O1uKs1QVKrFdkPgkoA0QnBemSmWWV8LrUvJLYbZzbhQ9cxjlZ9YqtN9YbYoi8FTOYpnb77jcm-FBoAojURgBy1hIluwsqpdNZIMyePaXKPYIKSHrdl0Gl3Ehc4RubOXbBRp%26sigh%3DDmU6f34sLsc9sWYhKeA0EqlRZ2c%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3D308c77b1506fe63b%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3DVXx_5kQaxJGg3jH-_5EcxU7ZQy8&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3DenThe adage that the fire service has more recently adopted states; “There are no “routine”calls”; referring to the safety consciousness that all responding companies should endeavor to consider when responding to an incident, that all too often appears; upon our arrival to be routine in every sense of the word. Whether it’s an alarm system activation, a report of food on the stove, or a report of a smoke detector alarming, we have a tendency to treat a lot of things as equal an very routine, based upon the periodicity and frequency of the alarm type and the typical inconsequential nature of the incident outcome.

This was far from it on Thursday May 7th, when Prince George’s County, Maryland, Firefighter/Medics were dispatched on a call that no one is soon to forget. Firefighters were alerted to respond to the Penn-Mar Shopping Center, a large 1-story strip mall, in the 3400 Block of Donnell Drive in Forestville and arrived at 12:59 PM.First arriving crews initiated an investigation into a strong odor of natural gas inside the businesses.

Firefighters evacuated 5 of the 6 stores that were in the area of the odor, a sixth store was vacant. Forty-five people were evacuated from the 5 stores and firefighters then started ventilation efforts and called for assistance of the Washington Gas Company.Firefighters discovered natural gas bubbling up from the ground on the exterior rear of the vacant store and minutes later reported that there was a fire on the interior.

Within a minute, at about 1:20 PM, a massive explosion occurred. A MAYDAY call was sounded and additional resources including paramedics and a second alarm assignment.

Go HERE, HERE and HERE for additional photos and incident details. More follow up HERE at STATter911, Map HERE and Audio HERE

The video clearly depicts the unassuming conditions prior to the explosion, which is quickly followed by the explosion and debris flying and subsequent fire ball. Large plate glass windows blew shattered glass and other debris 60-70 feet into the front parking lot, the roof assembly appeared to have been lifted up and then fell back into place and the rear brick and block wall was completely blown out. Firefighters were in the direct line of the explosion and suffered burns and injuries from flying debris.

Firefighters were wearing their personal protective gear which is believed to have minimized injuries. A total of eight firefighters sustained a variety of injuries ranging from lacerations to second degree burns. Four Firefighters were transported to the Washington Hospital Center Burn Unit where two were treated and released and two were admitted for additional treatment.

The lessons here are clear. Use your personal protective equipment effectively; don’t assume the routine nature of a given alarm will always result in a routine outcome. A good safety drill sheet for gas leak OPS from FFClosecalls.com HERE

Use the STAR method- Stop, Think, Act and Review.

Assume, “what’s the worst that can happen?”, and consider the options available to you as an incident command, company officer or as part of an operating team in your dynamic risk assessment and incident action planning. Stay safe out there in the streets today….

Follow-Up Breaking News: Six firefighters and one police officer were injured in an explosion in Providence RI on Saturday May 9th, when a blast happened around 12:30 a.m. on Pavillion Avenue in the city. companies were responding to a car that crashed into the front of an apartment complex. The Providence Fire Department said crews smelled a gas leak when they arrived at the scene of the crash. Just moments after firefighters shut off the gas line, something caused the explosion. One firefighter was thrown into the street and others were hurt when debris fell on top of them.

The Next Step; Size-up Must Evolve into Dynamic Management of Risk during Fire Attack

No comments

The Next Step; Size-up must evolve into dynamic management of risk during fire attack

The continuing emphasis on improving our safety culture and the reemergence of “safety” as a strategic pillar is evident in current fire service operations and initiatives. The 16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives (LSIs), first developed in 2004, provide a basis to further refine and improve areas of fireground operations. The LSIs have refocused attention on fire service practices and culture, which have, at times, demonstrated an indifference toward safety, including the management of risk at the command level. But despite the LSIs and other efforts, incident commanders (ICs) still employ inconsistent practices and exhibit cultural indifference related to the management of risk during structural fire suppression.


The Rearview Mirror
In 1952, Chief Lloyd Layman first published “Fundamentals of Firefighting Tactics,” in which he presented the formulative principles of fireground size-up—the foundation of risk management in the fire service today. Chief Layman stated, “Size-up is the mental evaluation made by the incident commander, which enables the IC to determine the course of action and to accomplish the mission.” Size-up factors were subsequently expanded to include facts, probabilities, situation, decisions, plans and operations. ICs primarily made decisions based on what they
knew about fire behavior in certain types of construction and occupancies; they used this information to determine fire suppression needs, resources and operational deployment.

The ensuing “war years” of the mid-1960s through the 1970s, firefighting size-up and structural fire engagement continued to place an emphasis and acceptability on aggressive interior operations, at times directly opposed to qualitative size-up risk indicators that suggested marginal or defensive operating profiles. In other words, we continued to promote and justify interior operations, in the face of high-risk operations.

These aggressive firefighting doctrines translated into the operational culture we struggle to modify today. Through several common themes, size-up and risk began to be related to building construction.
Examples include: Brannigan: “The Building Is the Enemy” (1971);
Dunn: “No Building Is Worth the Life of a Firefighter” (1985);
Brunacini: “We Will Risk” Doctrine (1985);
Brennan: “Make the Building Behave” (1995);
IAFC: “Risk Assessment & Rules of Engagement” (2001);
Goldfeder: “Everyone Goes Home” (2001); and
NFFF: 16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives (2004).

As a result of these concepts, long-held beliefs and established tactics began to be questioned. Risk/benefit, safety, assessment, and firefighter injury and LODD reduction were introduced into the size-up formula.

Today, we’re at a crossroads when it comes to risk management on the fireground. The risk-preferring traditional practices are being reassessed in today’s fire service at the command and company level. Size-up has evolved into “fireground risk assessment and management.”

Size-Up Isn’t Enough
Changes in building construction, occupancy profiles, materials and construction assemblies and systems make a “traditional” size-up inadequate for effectively managing risk on today’s fireground. Fire behavior principles from the last 75 years are no longer valid. The predictability of performance within our buildings and occupancies is significantly
challenged in today’s fireground setting. Although size-up has helped us manage risk to some
degree, significant cultural and technological impediments to firefighter safety still exist.

These include:
• Modern building construction is not predictable;
• Command and company officer technical knowledge may be diminished or deficient;
• Technological advancements in construction and materials have exceeded conventional fire suppression practices;
• Some fire suppression tactics are faulty or inappropriate, requiring innovative models and methods;
• We don’t consider redundancy in firefighting operations;
• Fire dynamics and behavior aren’t being effectively considered during fireground size-up;
• Risk management is either not practiced or is willfully ignored during most incident operations; and
• Some departments or officers show an indifference to safety and risk management.

Stop the Entertainment
But there’s another factor contributing to unsafe practices, one that we rarely talk about. In short, we need to stop “entertaining” ourselves during fire suppression operations and instead focus on comprehending and reacting to evolving risks.

What do I mean by “entertaining” ourselves? Rather than practicing appropriate risk management, I believe many individuals employ adverse behaviors that occur on a tactical level while ICs believe firefighters are completing their assigned tasks, thus compromising accountability.

These behaviors include:

Tactical amusement: engaging in any practice or tactic during fire suppression, support tasks or operations that places personnel at risk for the sake of entertainment.
Tactical diversion: diverting from an assignment while engaging in fire suppression, support tasks or operations in such a way that places personnel at risk.
Tactical circumvention: deliberately “getting around” an assignment or disregarding risk assessment and incident action plans.

If we’re going to reduce firefighter injuries and deaths, we must be doing the right thing, at the right time, for the right reasons, and in the right place. We must stop the entertainment.

Dynamic Risk Assesment
Fortunately, there is a strategy to help us overcome the limits of the traditional size-up: dynamic risk assessment, a continuous process of identifying hazards and taking action to eliminate them. The IC employing dynamic risk assessment doesn’t complete a size-up, form a plan and move on. They constantly monitor and review the fireground conditions, which are usually in a rapidly changing state, and they adjust
their plan accordingly. The management of dynamic risk comes down to effective, informed and decisive action during all phases of an incident.

Within the dynamic risk assessment model, two concepts stand out: risk recognition and communication of risk. All command and supervisory personnel and their operating companies must be able to recognize and appreciate the risks present at an incident. At the same time, they must be able to communicate what they see. Unlike conventional size-up, dynamic risk management requires a fluid flow and integration of observations throughout the command structure up to the IC level.

In Sum
The demands and requirements of modern firefighting will continue to require the
placement of personnel within situations and buildings that carry risk, uncertainty and inherent danger. As a result, risk management must become fluid and integrate all personnel. We must manage dynamic risks with a balanced approach of effective assessment, analysis and probability within
command decision making that results in safety conscious strategies and tactics.

The Opposing Spectrum of Fire Service Safety Culture

No comments

The Evolving Fire Service Safety Culture lies somewhere between two conflicting and opposing spectrums, marked by traditionalist emotions and conservative perspectives.It’s all about firefighter safety, survivability and doing the “job”; however we need to identify the common defining ground..

Let me offer this for consideration around the table today;

Aggressive: Assertive, bold, and energetic, forceful, determined, confident, marked by driving forceful energy or initiative, marked by combative readiness, assured, direct, dominate…

Measured: Calculated; deliberate, careful; restrained, think, considered, confident, alternatives, reasoned actions, in control, self assured, calm…

The shifting paradigms of the fire service, over 1484 LODD in the period of 1999-2009, evolved building construction, occupancies, construction and materials, fire behavior, fire loading, community profiles, fire dynamics, risk, staffing and resource levels, personnel and skills sets…

What’s the optimum definition that would define a highly skilled, knowledgeable and dedicated firefighter in 2009? Where do you fit in?

Fire Service Safety, Extinguishment, Tradition, Culture

No comments

Must read postings related to Fire Service Safety Culture versus the Culture of Extinguishment…Read on

Follow the Yellow Brick Road By Chief Art Goodrich

Borrowing and paraphrasing a comment made by FDNY Lt. Ray McCormack, I would wonder in his safety culture if I were the Cowardly Lion for a lack of courage, the Tin Man for lack of a heart or the Scarecrow for lack of a brain. I would think maybe some of all three, but this I know: Last week at FDIC, in just under 40 minutes, Safety in the fire service took a major hit.From the opening salvo delivered by Chief Bobby Halton to his “body-burying buddy”, FDNY Lt. Ray McCormack; disdain, indifference and apathy for a safer fire service was never more evident. And clearly, I will respectfully disagree with their messages in this year of personal responsibility for safety.

This I want to die with my boots on mentality in the fire service is killing us. I cannot recall one incident where SAFETY killed one of us at an incident. So, it is Safety that is our only hope for reducing injuries and deaths; both firefighter AND civilian.

http://thekitchentable.firerescue1.com/2009/04/follow-yellow-safety-brick-road.html

Firefighter Hourly’s Jay Lowry view points

Ray McCormack’s FDIC speech certainly seems to have split opinion across the fire service. Art Goodrich offered his take earlier on TKT. Fellow Kitchen Tabler and FR1 columnist Jay Lowry over at his FirefighterHourly blog gives a different perspective in the following post:

“When Lt. Ray McCormack stated the fire service was wrong in placing the lives of firefighters above the lives of civilians at FDIC the remarks found firefighters scratching their heads.However, to his credit, the Lieutenant said what needed to be said.

In departments nationwide safety is a concern but in some the emphasis on safety detracts from their ability to do the job effectively. This isn’t what firefighters are trained to do nor is it healthy for operations. In fact, an emphasis on safety can put firefighters in unsafe positions due to a timid approach.

http://thekitchentable.firerescue1.com/2009/04/ray-mccormacks-fdic-speech-certainly.html

Chief Mick Mayer’s: Let’s Talk Unemotionally About this

While I have been pursuing the discussion only peripherally as I have been very busy lately, I noted an undertone of something that I guess has nagged at me for quite some time. After thinking about it for a few days, I realized that the issues could actually be approached from a very pragmatic view that I posted at Firehouse Zen today.

Let’s just clarify some statements. I was not at FDIC for the big discussion, so I am only acting on what I am reading. But let’s just say that the argument that some organizations are too worried about safety and are not pursuing fires aggressively enough, and are therefore doing a disservice to their communities is a valid one. And let’s also bring into play another thing I keep hearing, that it is ridiculous to refer to the people we serve as “customers”, as also valid, although I think that customers is a better term for them than some of the other names I have called them under my breath at 0400. But I digress.

So then, what are they? Well, I guess the best thing to say is that they are “taxpayers”. After all, our service is largely supported by tax revenue in one way or another, so I think that is probably a pretty accurate definition, although I could argue that some of them aren’t paying taxes and maybe should be deserving of no service, but then again, I digress. Let’s say that even in a community that supports a robust volunteer response agency by way of donations only, the citizens and other potential users are in some form or fashion, paying for a service in which they expect some competency, timeliness, and efficiency.
Continue Reading Let’s Talk Unemotionally About It

http://thekitchentable.firerescue1.com/search/label/truck6alpha

Chief Ben Waller’s Extinguishment Culture or Safety Culture – Smart Fire Departments can have BOTH!

If you have a personal or departmental “Extinguishment Culture”, would you grab a line and enter this flashed over abandoned house that is showing signs of impending collapse? If you have a personal or departmental “Safety Culture”, would you wear your SCBA , a traffic safety vest, and crank a PPV fan while sitting in the rig a half-mile down the street? Chances are, if you are a U.S. firefighter, you’ll choose an option somewhere in between the two extremes.

In his recent FDIC speech, Lt. Ray McCormack, made some statements that have, to say the least, generated a great deal of controversy in the U.S. fire service. His comments in favor of an “Extinguishment Culture” and against a “Safety Culture” in particular have stimulated a lot of thought, comment, disagreement, and counter-disagreement. Art “ChiefReason” Goodrich, in particular, blogged a sharp and well-articulated counterpoint to Lt. McCormack’s thoughts, here.

http://thekitchentable.firerescue1.com/2009/05/extinguishment-culture-or-safety.html

Chief Art Zern’s Take Risk or Write it Off, Part 2

Back in January, I wrote a blog post asking the questi
on, “Can we establish a common understanding of risk? Or.. should we write it off?” Because my tongue was planted firmly in my cheek when I posed the question, I don’t want the point to be missed. I believe our duty to ourselves and our beloved fire service cannot be separated from our duty to the citizens we are sworn to and are obligated to protect. What is good for us is good for them.

My question is, are we seeing this trend to “let it burn” because we have given-up the fight to provide our members with all of those things that are necessary to provide effective and efficient fire and rescue services? Have we rolled-over, bent-over and given up our hopes to provide excellent service and the ability to accurately assess risk?

Have we allowed those that seek to undermine our mission to gain a foot-hold? Have we become complacent because we don’t believe it can or will happen today? Are the enemies of the fire service going to be allowed to dismantle our combat readiness to the point where the easy or only option is to “let it burn”?

When you have a few minutes, please view the FDIC keynote speech given by Lt. Ray McCormack. It was indeed an honor for me to be present as Lt. McCormack delivered a passionate plea to the fire service, to keep fire in our lives. I couldn’t agree more and as the saying goes, Ray’s speech spoke to me. Rather than commenting on or adding to Ray’s speech, I’ll let it stand on its own as a clarion call to the American fire service. We can’t allow the “safety experts” that promote the “let it burn” philosophy to convince firefighters that we should place our safety and our lives above the lives of our citizens.

http://community.fireengineering.com/profiles/blog/show?id=1219672%3ABlogPost%3A137785

Chief Pete Lamb’s “The Speech..”

There is a whole bunch of banter going on in the Internet world about the FDIC speech of FDNY Lt. Ray McCormack. I am a little late getting to this but I wanted to throw my two cents in about this issue.These thoughts are in no particular order and just represent what I think I heard in replaying it a couple of times.I am going to use the phrase ” I think I heard” in the points listed below. It does not represent the actual quotes that the Lt. used it is my impression and opinion of those points. (Official disclaimer, no flaming emails please ! (grin)

http://thekitchentable.firerescue1.com/search/label/petelamb

Chief Ed Hartin; Culture of Safety or Culture of Extinguishment

I had intended to write today’s post simply about the IFE Compartment Firefighting Special Interest Group in Sydney, Australia. However, the recent keynote presentation at the Fire Department Instructors Conference (FDIC) by FDNY Lieutenant Ray McCormack claiming the fire service needs a “culture of extinguishment not safety” cannot pass without comment.
I wonder how much of the commentary on the web is based on quotations pulled from LT McCormack’s Keynote Presentation or simply extension of comments by others. If you want to know what he said, listen to his entire presentation.

Too Much Safety
I disagree with much, but not all of what LT McCormack had to say. One of the memorable quotes from this speech is “Too much safety makes Johnny a poor leader and a terrible rescuer.” What does this really mean?

http://cfbt-us.com/wordpress/?p=477

2009 Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week

No comments

Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health and Survival Are Your Responsibility
June 14-20, 2009


Plan, get involved, engaged and take responsibility….

Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health and Survival Are Your Responsibility encourages chiefs and fire/EMS personnel to focus on what they personally can do to manage risk and enhance their health and safety. This year’s theme reflects the need for personal responsibility and accountability within a strong safety culture.

Recommended activities and materials will incorporate four key areas where standard operating procedures, policies and initiatives—along with the training and enforcement that support them—can limit fire/EMS personnel’s risk of injury or death:

Safety: Emergency Driving (enough is enough—end senseless deaths)

  • Lower speeds—stop racing to the scene. Drive safely and arrive alive to help others.
  • Utilize seat belts—never drive or ride without them.
  • Stop at every intersection—look in all directions and then proceed in a safe manner.

Health: Fire Fighter Heart Disease and Cancer Education and Prevention

  • Don’t smoke or use tobacco products.
  • Get active.
  • Eat a heart-healthy diet.
  • Maintain a healthy weight.
  • Get regular health screenings.

Survival: Structural Size-Up and Situational Awareness

  • Keep apprised of different types of building materials and construction used in your community.
  • Develop a comprehensive size-up checklist.
  • Always complete a 360° walk of the structure to collect valuable, operational decision-making information.
  • Learn the practice of reading smoke.
  • Be familiar with the accepted rules of engagement.
  • Learn your accountability system and use it.
  • Master your tools and equipment.
  • Remain calm and concentrate.

Chiefs: Be the Leader in Safety

  • Become personally engaged in safety and make it part of your strategic vision for the department.
  • Be willing to make the tough decisions regarding safety policies and practices and their implementation.
  • Hold members of the organization accountable for their safety and the safety of those with whom they work.
  • Ensure that resources are available to accomplish activities safely and effectively.

The IAFC encourages all fire/EMS departments to devote this week to reviewing safety policies, evaluating the progress of existing initiatives and discussing health and fitness. Fire/EMS departments should make a concerted effort during the week to correct safety deficiencies and to provide training as needed. An entire week is provided to ensure that each shift and duty crew can spend one day focusing on fire fighter safety, health and survival.

Check out the details and resources HERE and HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE

Risk versus Close Call, What are We Doing?

1 comment

Here’s one for timing. My recent post today on risk related to vacant or unoccupied structures…. Check out the series of photos for a close call incident involving a trailer fire, HERE. Photo sequence by Patrick Scott.

Again, the question before us; Why the risk, What’s the value, Who is looking out for our safety?Are we engaging in Tactical Entertainment….are we setting ourselves up for an injury or worst?

What’s in The Cards Today?

No comments

On any given day, we expect some fairly simple and basic things; Simple and basic from a firefighter’s perspective that is. We hope that we have a busy day, for the most part. That the alarms and incidents allow us to practice our skills and do what we do best. Deep down inside, we also hope that we have a good “job” come in.

Not that we hope or wish undue miss-fortune, distress or sorrow on anyone, but, IF a fire is going to happen, let it happen on my shift, my tour or while I’m at the firehouse and able to make the first-due. It’s a pretty fundamental hierarchy of need, and it’s what makes us tick at times. Because of who we are and what we do. Right?

The daily experience, expectations, our comfort zone; We’re Pretty Good At What We Do-Regularly….We Develop Profound Habits and Methods…We Treat a Lot of Things as Equal in May Respects…We’ve Grown Accustomed to Certain Operational Modes.

We don’t really think anything is going to happen to us, certainly nothing so adverse that I don’t go home after the call. Nothing is going to happen to YOU; it happens to someone else….BUT to everyone else-YOU are the other Guy!On any give day, at any give alarm, the dynamics around us at times are in or out of our control. We may not be able to see what the cards have in store for us, BUT we must ensure we use every bit of training, fortitude, knowledge, skills, courage, bravery, insights, luck and sometimes (other divine) intervention to get us through.

There have been a lot of bad things that have happened over the course of the past few weeks in the fire service, with the continuing trgic loss of brother firefighters in the line of duty, accidents, injuries and other situations both directly and indirectly.

Think about your actions, think about what you can do to make a difference or to alter or change the course of a situation. We sometimes have a greater hand in destiny and how the cards are dealt than we think. Be safe, have a great tour or stay at the firehouse today.

Safety Considerations for Buildings of Ordinary and Heavy Timber Construction

No comments

The recent structural collapse of a vacant five story building in the Tribeca section of New York City (lower Manhattan) brings to light the operational and safety issues affecting buildings of Ordinary (Type III) or Heavy Timber (Type IV) classified construction.There are a number of excellent lessons learned from Near Miss Reports found on the National Firefighter Near Miss Reporting System. The NFF NMRS’s 2009 calendar has a monthly theme related to a near miss event report and is supported by training and informational resources that provide expanded opportunities for training and insights.The theme for May is Structural Collapse. I developed a power point program and a supporting white paper that provides Operational and Safety Considerations for Buildings of Ordinary and Heavy Timber Construction. Check out the resources and download the program, it’ll provide you with some good safety insights and operational considerations.http://www.firefighternearmiss.com/data/Resources/Calendar/NMR%20May2009Narrative_naum.dochttp://www.firefighternearmiss.com/data/Resources/Other/MayModulePowerPoint09.ppt

Vacant or Unoccupied: Tactical Risk and Safety

No comments

We seem to do a lot of things at times out of common practice and repetition, you know; “We’ve always done it that way….” syndrome. There’s a resonating theme that is making its way around the fire service dealing with going to a defensive tactical posture at vacant or unoccupied structure fires.

This command posture leads to limiting interior operating engagement, while promoting a high degree of risk management.With that being said, there are also plenty of opinions on these types of policies as such, since this type of tactical effort may be contrary to the local “culture and traditions” of the responding agencies and may be a hard pill to swallow, since we’re in the job of “ fighting ALL fires..” Please refresh your memories on a past post on Tactical Entertainment HERE and HERE

Here are some basic definitions to keep us all on the same playing field;

Vacant; refers to a building that is not currently in use, but which could be used in the future. The term “vacant” could apply to a property that is for sale or rent, undergoing renovations, or empty of contents in the period between the departure of one tenant and the arrival of another tenant. A vacant building has inherent property value, even though it does not contain valuable contents or human occupants.

Unoccupied; generally refers to a building that is not occupied by any persons at the time an incident occurs. An unoccupied building could be used by a business that is temporarily closed (i.e. overnight or for a weekend). The term unoccupied could also apply to a building that is routinely or periodically occupied; however the occupants are not present at the time an incident occurs. A residential structure could be temporarily unoccupied because the residents are at work or on vacation. A building that is temporarily unoccupied has inherent property value as well as valuable contents.

The question today, as you’re having coffee around the table is this. As a responding company, you arrive at the scene of a vacant or unoccupied structure. The building’s construction features and systems have inherent risk associated with the occupancy, (as is the case with nearly all of our structures and occupancies).

Your company determines that you’re going to go defensive, even though you probably could make a reasonably safe entry and engage in interior structural fire suppression.

Would there be any repercussions in your station, battalion/district/community or organization if you took this tactic? What are YOUR personal thoughts on this form of risk management?

Some insights, HERE and HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE

First-Due, Second-Due; Do Not Pass Go, Proceed Directly to Jail

No comments

Last week a horrific accident involving two responding fire apparatus collided in an intersection resulting in serious personal injuries to eleven people, nine of which were firefighters. The resulting collision caused significant property damage to the six month old aerial ladder and the year old engine.

The preliminary investigation of the crash indicated that the apparatus driver of the aerial truck may have run a red light at the intersection, while the engine company driver had the green light. The engine company also had control of the Opticom system at the intersection. Both companies were responding to what initially was a reported fire call-but turned out to be public works crew smoke-testing sewer lines.The most significant issue that has arisen thus far is that law enforcement officials have determined that aerial ladder driver ran the red traffic signal-causing last weeks crash, and now has officially been charged with failure to use due caution. The aerial ladder subsequently rolled, hit a woman on a bicycle, snapped a utility pole and landed on top of a car. The bicyclist crushed by the ladder truck, remains in critical condition.

The ramifications of this charge may be far reaching in a number of ways. And all of this for the first-due.You know what I mean. Responding to what has all the makings of a “good” call, knowing that other companies are heading to the same address from different stations or departments- All with one goal in mind; being first-due. It’s interesting to note, one of the articles in the local news media mentions, “Did station rivalry cause the fire truck crash?” Take a look HERE. Say it ain’t so! Trying to beat another company in to the scene- preposterous, we don’t do anything like that! Running red lights, blowing through intersections, pushing the envelope with the speed limit..all in the name of the first-due.

When are we going get it! Stop and think about some of the moral, ethical and legal responsibilities the next time you get behind the wheel of an apparatus and begin rolling out the station. Whether you’re the apparatus driver or the company officer-SOMEONE needs to keep the response in check and balance the urgency, severity, the needs and the timliness of the response. YOU as the apparatus drive NEED to take FULL responsibility. Can you handle that?

Take a look at some of the incident reports on the NIOSH Reports or at the EGH site. Stop and think, is it worth the risks you’re taking? You may not have the chance to pass go, you won’t be collection 200 dollars; You may be going directly to jail- with no free get out of jail card. Slow down, drive responsibly, there’s always going to be another call, there always is.

Running Against the Wind

No comments

It seems like yesterday..But it was long ago. Against the wind, We were running against the wind. We were young and strong, we were runningAgainst the wind..And the years rolled slowly past. And I found myself alone.. Surrounded bv strangers I thought were my friends, I found myself further and further from my home.. And I guess I lost my way There were oh so many roads I was living to run and running to live…

There’s something familiar and haunting about Bob Seger’s song, “Against the Wind”. I was working late the other night on a series of training programs specific to command decision-making and risk management and safety. With the radio on in the back ground, I found myself stopping for a moment while Seger’s song played on.

Ok, I know what some of you are thinking. Here we go again; Firefighter Safety! Safety Culture! change what we’re doing… But you know, it certainly seems like the years have rolled slowly past and yes with so, so many roads, paths and directions that time has taken us from and to.I think back and we all were living to run [calls] and running to live.

I remember when we were running calls and working jobs at a far greater pace and frequency than anything of recent. And with those call, the risks we would take and the places we would find ourselves,many without goor reason, other than for the love of fighting fire and doing what we did best.

But it does seem like we were running against the wind in so many ways.Here we find the fire service looking at our culture, attitudes and statistics in the escalating firefighter LODD and firefighter injury rates. There’s an awful lot of time, energy and resources being committed and directed towards fire service safety. Is anyone really listening? Does anyone really care? Is the fact that it happens-Somewhere else; not here, not to me, not my department! Are You and your company paying attention? are you doing something to correct the trend?

With all my travels and lectures across the country, hearing the conflicting dialog amoungst us; it sometimes feels like I’m against the wind . I’m still runnin’ against the wind . I’m older now but still running…..Against the wind.

Structural Stability of Engineered Lumber in Fire Conditions – Free Online Course from UL

No comments

Structural Stability of Engineered Lumber in Fire Conditions – Free Online CourseThis two-hour presentation summarizes a research study on the hazards posed to firefighters by the use of lightweight construction and engineered lumber in floor and roof designs.

This presentation will allow fire professionals to better interpret fire hazards and assess risk for life safety of building occupants and firefighters.This research study was funded by the Department of Homeland Security’s Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program.

Objectives: Provide brief history of events leading up to DHS Grant testsIdentify the fire test hypothesis, parameters, and steps completed in the testing process.
Compare tests results (legacy vs. modern construction).
Communicate learnings from our partners representing the fire serviceDiscuss code recommendations

http://www.uluniversity.us/home.aspx

Take a Good Look Around-This is Your Town

No comments

As you drive about your response district today, coming back from an alarm, heading to the firehouse tonight or running errands around your community this weekend, take a good look around.

Ask your self a simple question; “How well do you know the buildings, structures and occupancies in your response jurisdiction?”Be honest, do you really understand how those “older residential” structures were built and understand how fire travels and impacts your fireground operations?

Are your aware of the newest features of engineered structural support systems being constructed within that new set of homes going up in your second-due area? Are you aware, that vacant office building is being converted into a light manufacturing and assembly business?

How about those unoccupied store fronts and businesses that have recently closed up due to the tough economic times…. any special hazards or operational concerns to your company should you get a dispatch to respond?

Have the senior members of your station or department shared their stories of operations and incidents at various buildings around your district or community? Did you listen to them, or were you quick to dismiss those “old war stories”.

There’s a wealth of “pre-planning’ nuggets hidden in those stories. Take the time to listen, remember or postulate.Take a good look around….think about any given building, the one across the street that you’re looking at while you wait for the traffic light to change; Think about a fire in that same building.

Do you really understand how it will truly perform under combat structural fire conditions? What’s the building’s collapse profile, how much operational time will you have, what dynamic risk assessment factors will you have to deal with, how safe is it for you to engage in interior operations upon your arrival? How can this building, its occupancy and structural system hurt, my team, my company, my firefighters, my department, me?Sometimes things aren’t as obvious as them seem.

You may have responded and operated at numerous incidents at a wide variety of buildings in your response area, or very few; some routine, others maybe more demanding…the question remains, “What do you Really know about your buildings?” Your life may one day depend on what you actually do know or recollect. Take a good look around ….

2008 Firefighter Near Miss Annual Report Issued

No comments

The 2008 Near-Miss Annual Report was recently issued and is available on the NMR Webs site HERE.

The report was also included in the February issue of FireRescue magazine.If you would like more copies of the 2008 Near-Miss Annual Report please e-mail Amanda McHenry at amchenry@iafc.org with your contact name, address and amount needed.

To download an electronic version please visit the resources page or click here Annual Report 2008.Check out the other resources and information the web site

Houston FD Mayday Operations & RIT

No comments

In case some of you missed the excellent video that depicts the operations of the Houston FD at a Four Alarm Fire in an office building on March 28, 2007 HERES some information.

The fire resulted in three civilian fatalities with three firefigher injuries. There was a significant mayday and RIT operation that evolved during the incident that was produced into a DVD with scene video and radio communications. The DVD was produced by the bravestonline.com

This is a must see video. Get the HFD After Action Report of the fire at 9343 North Loop East, which makes understanding the scope and magnitude of the event clearer HERE. While battling the high-rise fire, Capt. Joel Eric Abbt, assigned to Station 8, was on the fifth floor of the building searching for victims when he ran into trouble. His first mayday call was all but drowned out by the chatter of other firefighters engaged in rescues. The DVD of the 27-minute search and the captain’s frantic calls for help is now available though a website, The Bravest Online as tagged above.

The image above is the office building before the fire.

Firehouse.com coverage: http://cms.firehouse.com/web/online/News/DVD-Recounts-Houston-Mayda…$55959
http://cms.firehouse.com/content/article/article.jsp?sectionId=46&id;=54084

Preventing Deaths and Injuries of Fire Fighters Working Above Fire-Damaged Floors

1 comment

Fire fighters are at risk of falling through fire-damaged floors. Fire burning underneath floors can significantly degrade the floor system with little indication to fire fighters working above. Floors can fail within minutes of fire exposure, and new construction technology such as engineered wood floor joists may fail sooner than traditional construction methods. NIOSH recommends that fire fighters use extreme caution when entering any structure that may have fire burning beneath the floor. Report HERE

Description of Exposure
Fire fighters are at risk of falling through fire-damaged floors. Floors may fail within minutes of flame contact. Carpet, ceramic tile, lightweight concrete, and similar floor coverings may increase the danger to firefighters because of the added weight being supported by the floor system and the insulation these materials provide that may cause the floor to not feel warm, despite the fire underneath.

All wood-based construction materials are subject to failure when exposed to fire. Experimental studies and NIOSH investigations suggest that engineered wood floor systems may fail sooner than traditional sawn lumber floors. The difference in times to failure appears to be a matter of minutes, and fire fighters will seldom know how long a fire has been burning when they arrive on scene. Consequently, fire fighters must use extreme caution when operating on any flooring system potentially exposed to fire.

Engineered wood I-joists represent a rising technology in the building sector; they offer several advantages over traditional construction methods. Engineered wood I-joists are typically prefabricated using sawn or structural composite lumber for the top and bottom flanges (usually 1 ½ to 3 ½ inches wide) and plywood or oriented strand board (OSB) sheathing for the vertical web (3/8 to 7/16 inches thick) (see Figure 1). Engineered wood I-joists are lighter, stiffer, and will not warp, twist, or shrink like traditional framing materials. Engineered wood I-joists also reduce total construction time and labor costs by their ease of installation.

Engineered wood I-joists have grown in use since the early 1990s and by 2005 were estimated to be used in more than half of all wood-frame construction [APA 2005]. Changes in the building construction industry driven by technological advancements and societal needs suggest that the use of engineered wood products will continue to grow.

The engineered wood I-joist has a different cross-sectional profile than a standard solid sawn wood joist and in testing, burned more quickly. Typically, the thinner web was consumed first. Underwriters Laboratories (UL) [2008]; [Straseske and Weber 1988; Weyerhaeuser 1986]. The UL tests show that unprotected lightweight engineered floor joist (I-joists) assemblies can fail in as little as 6 minutes, and that traditional unprotected residential floor construction assemblies failed in less than 19 minutes.

Previous studies that used different test methods suggested even shorter times-to-failure. These study results indicate that any floor system can fail quickly, and that unprotected engineered wood I-joists may fail sooner. Results from experiments conducted by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) are expected in the spring of 2009, and will be available at http://www.fire.gov/. The NIST experiments were conducted in ventilation limited conditions meant to represent an actual basement fire.

Fire fighters who operate on fire-damaged floors of all types have fallen through the weakened floor and been trapped in the fire below [NIOSH 2005]. Similar hazards exist when fire fighters work under fire-damaged floor systems that collapse onto them. The following is a NIOSH case investigation involving an unprotected engineered wood floor system. The weakened floor was undetectable from above, although outside conditions indicated the possibility of a basement fire.
Case Study
On August 13, 2006, a 55-year-old male career engineer (the victim) died and his partner was injured after they fell through the floor at a residential structure fire. The house was built in 1999, and the first floor contained a heated flooring system consisting of a hot water piping system encased in lightweight concrete supported by engineered wood I-joists and trusses. The basement was unfinished and the bottom sides of the I-joists and floor trusses were exposed. An engine company was conducting a fast attack on a suspected basement fire, while a ladder company conducted horizontal ventilation.

The victim and his partner were conducting a primary search on the ground floor. Smoke filled the ground floor and made visibility near zero, but little heat was detected as the victim and his partner conducted a left-hand search. They sounded the ceramic tile floor and took one crawling step forward on their knees when the floor collapsed. The partner fell on the other side of a basement door into a hallway and crawled out of a basement window. The victim fell into the room of fire origin and was recovered the next day. The floor collapsed about 11 minutes after the initial 911 dispatch [NIOSH 2006].

Controls
To minimize risk when working above fire-damaged floors, NIOSH recommends that fire departments and fire fighters take the measures identified below. Many of these prevention measures are from the NIOSH Alert: Preventing Injuries and Deaths of Fire Fighters due to Truss System Failures [2005]. Lightweight truss systems and engineered wood floor joists have similar fire degradation risks.

  • Conduct a thorough fire size-up and communicate the findings to all personnel on-scene before entering the building.
  • Incident commanders and company officers should be trained and experienced in structure fire size up to avoid putting fire fighters at unneeded risk of working above fire-damaged floors.
  • Do not enter a structure, room, or area when fire is suspected to be directly beneath the floor or area where fire fighters would be operating, or if the location of the fire is unknown.
  • Never assume structural safety of any floor (regardless of the construction) having a significant fire under it.
  • Conduct pre-incident planning inspections during the construction phase to identify the type of floor construction.
  • If pre-planning is not conducted, assume residential construction and small commercial buildings built since the early 1990s may contain engineered wood I-joists.
  • Report construction deficiencies noted during preplanning to local building code officials. For example, engineered wood floor joists should only be modified per manufacturer specifications–usually limited to cutting to length and removing pre–cut knockouts for utility access.
  • Report damaged or cut chords or webs to building officials.
  • Develop, enforce, and follow standard operating procedures (SOPs) on how to size up and combat fires safely in buildings of all construction types.
  • Rapid intervention teams (RIT) should include a portable ladder with their RIT equipment when deployed at basement fires.
  • Provide training on identifying signs of weakened floor systems (soft or spongy feel, heat transmitted through fl
    oor, downward bowing, etc.).
  • Make fire fighters aware that all floor types can fail with little or no warning.
  • Use a thermal imaging camera to help locate fires burning below or within floor systems, but recognize that the camera cannot be relied upon to assess the strength or safety of the floor.
  • Fire fighters should be trained on the use of thermal imaging cameras, including limitations and difficulties in detecting fire burning below floor systems.
  • Immediately evacuate and, if possible, use alternate exit routes when floor systems directly beneath the floor where fire fighters would be operating are weakened by fire.
  • Use defensive overhaul procedures after fire extinguishment in structures containing fire-damaged floor systems of all types.
  • Consider becoming active in the building code process and influence requirements for fire resistance of floor and ceiling systems to further fire fighter safety and health.

In addition, NIOSH recommends the following:
Trade associations and building contractors should consider providing education and training to fire service organizations on the hazards fire fighters face when fighting fires that have weakened all types of structural members. An example of such training is available at http://www.woodaware.info/.

Builders, contractors, and owners should consider protecting all floor systems, including engineered wood I-joists, by covering the underside with fire-resistant materials [Underwriters Laboratories 2008].

Builders, contractors, and owners should consider incorporating sprinkler systems into residential construction. Sprinkler use reduces the chances of both residential and fire fighter fatalities [USFA 2008].

References
APA [2005]. Wood I-joist floors, fire fighters and fire. APA?The Engineered Wood Association. Tacoma, WA. Form No. TT–015B.
NIOSH [2005]. NIOSH alert: preventing injuries and deaths of fire fighters due to truss system failures. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005–132.
NIOSH [2006]. Career engineer dies after falling through floor while conducting a primary search at a residential structure fire—Wisconsin. Morgantown, WV: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation (FACE) Report F2006–26.
Straseske J, Weber C [1988]. Testing floor systems. Fire Command. June:47–48.
Weyerhaeuser [1986]. Flame penetration ratings according to ASTM test method E119 utilizing a small scale furnace. Longview, WA: Weyerhaeuser Company Fire Technology Laboratory, Report No. 665.
Underwriters Laboratories [2008]. Report on structural stability of engineered lumber in fire conditions. Northbrook, IL: Underwriters Laboratories, File No. NC9140.
USFA [2008]. USFA Position Paper—Residential fire sprinklers. United States Fire Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. March 28, 2008. http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/sprinkler_position_paper.pdf

More More Information
The NIOSH Alert: Preventing Injuries and Deaths of Fire Fighters due to Truss System Failures includes relevant information and prevention recommendations. Construction truss systems and engineered floor joists have similar collapse hazards associated with fire degradation.

The NIOSH Alert is available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2005-132/

The American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA;) and the U.S. Fire Administration have developed the following Web site with information for the fire service about traditional and engineered wood products: http://www.woodaware.info/. A CD entitled Awareness Level

Firefighter Training for Modern Wood Products developed in cooperation with the Illinois Fire Service Institute is available from fire@woodaware.info.

Underwriters Laboratories, with funding from the Department of Homeland Security, has developed an on-line course for fire professionals, “Structural Stability of Engineered Lumber in Fire Conditions” available at http://www.uluniversity.us/

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Building and Fire Research

Laboratory maintains a Web site with links to publications on fire safety topics: http://www.fire.nist.gov/. Information on engineered wood I-joist research at NIST can be found at http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/techbeat/tb2007_0830.htm#firetest.

NIOSH Web site at www.cdc.gov/niosh

For a monthly update on news at NIOSH, subscribe to NIOSH eNews by visiting http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/eNews/.