Skip to content


Archives for

See all posts in the network tagged with

Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program: Leading Recommendations for Preventing Fire Fighter Fatalities, 1998–2005

No comments

NIOSH issues Report on: Leading Recommendations for Preventing Fire Fighter Fatalities, 1998–2005

The United States currently depends on approximately 1.1 million fire fighters to protect its citizens and property from losses caused by fire. Each year in the United States, approximately 100 fire fighters die in the line of duty. Sudden cardiac death is the leading cause of fatalities, followed by trauma. In 1998, Congress appropriated funds to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) for a fire fighter safety initiative. As part of this initiative, NIOSH developed and implemented the Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program (FFFIPP).

The overall goal of the NIOSH FFFIPP is to reduce the number of fire fighter fatalities. To accomplish this goal, NIOSH conducts investigations of line-of-duty fire fighter deaths to identify contributing factors and to generate recommendations for prevention.

This document is a synthesis of the 1,286 individual recommendations from the 335 FFFIPP investigations conducted from 1998 to 2005. We hope that the fire service will use this document as a resource and catalyst for developing, updating, and implementing effective policies, programs, and training to prevent fatalities among fire fighters.

Executive Summary
The report document summarizes the most frequent recommendations from the first 8 years of the NIOSH Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program (FFFIPP). The overall goal of the program is to reduce the number of fire fighter fatalities.

Through 2005, the FFFIPP investigated 335 fatal incidents involving 372 fire fighter fatalities. The investigations encompassed a variety of circumstances such as cardiovascular-related deaths, motor vehicle accidents, structure fires, diving incidents, and electrocutions. Fatalities have been investigated in career, volunteer, and combination departments in both urban and rural settings throughout the United States.

This document shares the most common recommendations from the 335 investigations and more than 1,286 recommendations that were developed by NIOSH investigators. These recommendations were developed using existing fire service standards, guidelines, standard operating procedures, and other relevant resources over the first eight years of the program. Fire departments can use this document when developing, updating, and implementing policies, programs, and training for fire fighter injury prevention efforts.

Download or review the NIOSH Report HERE

Incident Melt-down and Command Failures

No comments

Check out the story and references to the controversial 8-alarm fire that occured on December 14, 2007 at the Lorraine Apartment Building in Gloucester, MA. The fire, just across the street from the Central Fire Station, left a 70-year-old man dead, destroyed the apartment building and a synogogue. The fire chief announced his retirement just minutes after the city released the results of the investigative report into the fire department’s actions during a fatal fire in December, 2007.

Firegeezer and STATer911 have extensive coverage and media information, video and clips….

Some Report findings…

  1. There was no formal incident command.
  2. Companies were operating on the interior without adequate communications.
  3. No safety officer was assigned or even found to be included in the operating procedures of the department.
  4. Scene security was inadequate to nonexistent.
  5. Interagency organization and the liaison to outside agencies was nonexistent
  6. Crews were operating unsafely above the fire floor without access to charged hose lines.
  7. The Fire Department was unprepared to battle a fire of this size; report also indicates that personnel had not been sufficiently trained.
  8. Since the incident, neither the fire chief nor the department had initiated any changes to the department’s standard operating procedures.

After the report was released Barry McKay, who has been the Gloucester chief for 25-years, retired. The critical report findings called for major reform of the fire department. A member of the department for 35 years — and its chief for nearly 26 — McKay, 58, made no direct reference to the Lorraine fire or the after incident report in his letter of retirement, which becomes effective March 29. “My retirement comes with mixed emotions,” McKay’s letter said. “I can only praise and thank the firefighters of this city for making due with the limited resources and maintaining the fire and emergency services. The firefighters I have worked with since the early 1970s have truly been the finest public servants and best people I’ve ever known.” as published in the gloucestertimes online edition .

  • Investigative Report
  • Report Appendices
  • Read the latest report on this development in the Gloucester Daily Times HERE.
  • Firegeezer’s friends at FireVideo.net sent along this raw video of the infamous upside-down ladder raise.

http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAAEbqiT-pXmimn7VDny7-dKqZpLEubF2JepF2gT2mAr42Ef1q6WP780bLdcGdo6DENVioawOtlnw3EbQowQSdMeYPzb-GLNG17hpTDSWK0WiwAMwtHuR3fs-04wAKs3jIu4ifqHYi6qqyA8Sh2YISZhJrntWsWWkBLNw93ptVpu-5AvP65aDmt8j0K3wpBVETTJNBCkvB5naPF0rW1cvHrzBM306AY_GRe6BRlB9juVaV%26sigh%3Dzfb5cg7g-KLNba8iIb5kdL5JRLQ%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3Decab8a352b3a641e%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3DjIuICDMOQIXUgqt6RSdkukytUBk&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3Den

Fire/EMS Survival Alert from the IAFC

No comments

Fire/EMS Survival Alert from the IAFC

We know all fire chiefs and most members of the fire/EMS service are focused on budget and related issues these days. With some very recent firefighter line-of-duty deaths, it’s also important for all members of the fire/EMS service to keep a strong focus and redouble efforts on issues related to firefighter injury and LODD prevention.

Without question, the most valuable component of any community’s fire/EMS service are the firefighters and EMS personnel who provide that service, and protecting those personnel must be the #1 priority. Serious development of applicable policies and procedures are the basis of an effective risk-management program. Once established, training on those policies and strict enforcement have proven to be effective in reducing injury and death to firefighters and EMS personnel.

  • So far in 2009, just some fire/EMS LODDs include:
  • Several firefighter LODDs due to medical emergencies
  • One firefighter struck and killed by backing apparatus at a working fire
  • One firefighter killed in a crash between apparatus and a firefighter’s POV
  • An apparatus MVA vs. structure returning from an incident
  • One firefighter electrocuted at MVA scene
  • Two firefighters killed when they fell from the bucket of an aerial device during training
  • One firefighter shot at an EMS incident scene
  • Two firefighters killed in a mobile-home fire
  • One firefighter killed in an apparatus crash while responding to a reported structural fire

Each of these tragic line-of-duty deaths should be evaluated for applicability in our own departments and companies. Because they’re so recent, there are no official reports available yet, but that shouldn’t prevent us from learning what we can from what we know.
The following are resources that can immediately be accessed by fire chiefs, fire officers, firefighters and EMS personnel to conduct reviews to minimize the chances for our personnel getting injured or killed in the line of duty:

Mobile-home LODD investigations:
Fire Fighter (Lieutenant) Killed and One Fire Fighter Injured During Mobile Home Fire– Pennsylvania
Recreational Vehicle Fire Claims the Life of One Fire Fighter and Injures Two Other Fire Fighters – Arkansas

MVA incidents including tanker rollovers, crashes, etc.:
Fire Fighter Dies in a Tanker Crash – Louisiana
Junior Fire Fighter Dies and Three Volunteer Fire Fighters are Injured in a Tanker Crash – Alabama
Assistant Chief Killed When Struck by Tractor-Trailer While Operating at a Motor Vehicle Crash – North Carolina
Deputy Fire Chief Dies When Struck by Motorized Water Monitor that “Launched” Off Aerial Ladder Truck – Pennsylvania
This report includes a link to the NIOSH Safety Advisory: Improper Set-up of Aerial Ladders with a Locking Waterway May Put Fire Fighters at Risk
Additional emergency-vehicle safety resources:
Safety Week: Vehicle Safety Resources
www.iafc.org/vehiclesafety
www.iaff.org/hs/EVSP/home.html
USFA: Emergency Vehicle Safety
http://www.respondersafety.com/
Recent CVD medical emergency reports and NIOSH alerts:
Fire Fighter Dies While Performing Exterior Fire Suppression at a Large Machine Shed Fire – Illinois
Fire Fighter Trainee Suffers Sudden Cardiac Death During Strenuous Training Drill – Georgia
Fire Fighter Suffers Sudden Cardiac Death After Responding to Two Calls – Kansas
NIOSH CVD Alert: Preventing Fire Fighter Fatalities Due to Heart Attacks and Other Sudden Cardiovascular Events
Recent structure-fire reports and related NIOSH alerts:
Fire Fighter and Trapped Resident Die and a Lieutenant is Injured following a Duplex Fire – Pennsylvania
Fire Fighter Dies and Captain is Injured During a Civilian Rescue Attempt at a Residential Structure Fire – Georgia
A Mutual Aid Captain and Fire Fighter Die in a Remodeled Residential Structure Fire – Texas
NIOSH Alert: Preventing Injuries and Deaths of Fire Fighters Due to Truss System Failures
Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program:
Leading Recommendations for Preventing Fire Fighter Fatalities, 1998–2005
Fire/EMS safety in possible act-of-violence responses:
A Must: Staging Areas For Violent Crime Scenes
Career Lieutenant Killed and Fire Fighter Injured By Gunfire While Responding To Medical Assistance Call – Kentucky
Additional sites for related LODD prevention:
Safety Week Resources
www.iafc.org/wfi
http://www.healthy-firefighter.org/
http://www.everyonegoeshome.com/
www.firefighternearmiss.com/Links
http://www.firefighterclosecalls.com/

For more information and help related to the prevention of any firefighter/EMS personnel LODD, visit the IAFC’s Safety, Health and Survival Section’s website.

Situational Awareness and Risk during Fireground Operations

No comments

On the February, 2009 edition of Firehouse.com, Training and Tactics Talk, host Chief Douglas K. Cline looks at the role of size-up in today’s “strategy and tactics” on the fireground.

Chief Cline and Christopher J. Naum focus this program on equipping fire officers and firefighters with the tools needed to understand and perform effective size-ups with true situational awareness. They help incorporate the critical risk/benefit analysis tool in this global perspective look at incidents.

The chief’s add real world experience into this program bringing experience and responses into a dynamic mix for effective training.

USFA Releases Provisional 2008 Firefighter Fatality Statistics

No comments

USFA Releases Provisional 2008 Firefighter Fatality Statistics
The United States Fire Administration (USFA) announced there were 114 on-duty firefighter fatalities in the United States as a result of incidents that occurred in 2008. During this period, there were firefighters lost from 34 states and one from the Virgin Islands. North Carolina experienced the highest number of fatalities (11), while Oregon (9), Pennsylvania (9), California ( 8), New York (7), Illinois (6), Missouri (6), and Ohio (6) each suffered more than 5 on-duty losses.

As the USFA continues to collect and evaluate information regarding the 2008 on-duty firefighter deaths, here are some of the early known facts:
Preliminary estimates indicate that heart attacks and strokes were responsible for the deaths of 50 firefighters (43.8%) in 2008. This shows a decrease from 54 of the 118 (45.7%) firefighters in 2007.

  • In 2008, 26 on-duty firefighters died in association with wildland fires.
  • This loss is more than double the 11 wildland firefighter fatalities in 2007.
  • The 2008 toll is also above the annual average of 21 wildland fire-associated fatalities over the past 10 years, 1999-2008.
  • For 2008, 64.9% of all firefighter fatalities occurred while performing emergency duties.
  • Twenty-nine firefighters died in 2008 as the result of vehicle crashes.
  • Fourteen of these deaths involved aircraft crashes.
  • Fifteen firefighters died in motor vehicle crashes.
  • Six firefighters were killed in crashes involving their personal vehicles and three died in water tender (tanker) crashes. These two vehicle types have historically been most often involved in crashes that take the lives of firefighters.
  • Speed and a lack of seat belt use historically contribute to these incidents.

These fatality statistics for 2008 are provisional and subject to change as the USFA contacts State Fire Marshals to verify the names of firefighters reported to have died on-duty during 2008.

The final number of firefighter fatalities will be reported in USFA’s annual firefighter fatality report and is expected to be available by early July.
For additional information on firefighter fatalities, including the annual fatality reports from 1986 through 2007 and the Firefighter Fatality Retrospective Study 1990–2000, please visit the USFA Web site.

Everyone Goes Home

No comments

Everyone Goes Home® is a national program by the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation to prevent line-of-duty deaths and injuries. In March 2004, a Firefighter Life Safety Summit was held to address the need for change within the fire service.

Through this meeting, the 16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives were produced and a program was born to ensure that Everyone Goes Home®.

  1. Define and advocate the need for a cultural change within the fire service relating to safety; incorporating leadership, management, supervision, accountability and personal responsibility.
  2. Enhance the personal and organizational accountability for health and safety throughout the fire service.
  3. Focus greater attention on the integration of risk management with incident management at all levels, including strategic, tactical, and planning responsibilities.
  4. All firefighters must be empowered to stop unsafe practices.
  5. Develop and implement national standards for training, qualifications, and certification (including regular recertification) that are equally applicable to all firefighters based on the duties they are expected to perform.
  6. Develop and implement national medical and physical fitness standards that are equally applicable to all firefighters, based on the duties they are expected to perform.
  7. Create a national research agenda and data collection system that relates to the initiatives.
  8. Utilize available technology wherever it can produce higher levels of health and safety.
  9. Thoroughly investigate all firefighter fatalities, injuries, and near misses.
  10. Grant programs should support the implementation of safe practices and/or mandate safe practices as an eligibility requirement.
  11. National standards for emergency response policies and procedures should be developed and championed.
  12. National protocols for response to violent incidents should be developed and championed.
  13. Firefighters and their families must have access to counseling and psychological support.
  14. Public education must receive more resources and be championed as a critical fire and life safety program.
  15. Advocacy must be strengthened for the enforcement of codes and the installation of home fire sprinklers.
  16. Safety must be a primary consideration in the design of apparatus and equipment.

2009 Safety, Health & Survival Week; June 14-20

No comments

2009 Safety, Health & Survival Week: June 14 – 20

This year’s theme – Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health & Survival Are Your Responsibility encourages chiefs and Fire/EMS personnel to focus on what they personally can do to manage risk and enhance their health and safety.

Visit: 2009 Safety, Health & Survival Week Website

360 Degrees of Separation

No comments

360 Degrees of Separation. The fireground often has competing or conflicting incident priorities, demands or distractions before a complete appreciation of all mission critical or essential information and data has been obtained. The effective assessment of the incident scene is much more than the three-sided size-up methodology of past fireground practices. In fact the term size-up doesn’t align with the newest directions in firefighter safety and incident command management.

The 360 degree assessment has become the generally accepted standard from which risk assessment is performed and incident action plans derived. The fact that many LODD case studies and reports repeatedly indicate the lack of an effective 360 degree assessment of the incident scene where structural fire engagement is being initiated was a contributing factor or may have contributed to a different incident outcome.

Think about the effectiveness and value that the 360 ◦ Degree assessment brings to the development of an effective and valid incident action plan and the tactics that are driven by those identified and assumed assessment indicators.The question is: Are you conducting a 360 upon arrival, and if not WHY?

Remember: All command and supervisory personal and operating companies must be able to recognize and appreciate the risks which are present at an incident in order to carry out an effective dynamic risk assessment. The 360 Degree assessment is a mission critical element for effective and safety incident operations.

Don’t for a moment think, “it takes too long to perform” or that you don’t have time to conduct, especially from a company officer perspective when you’re deploying and initiating tactical assignments. That extra minute to conduct a “three-sixty” may make all the difference in the world…..There may be three hundred and sixty degrees of safety margin that separate you and your company between injury or death….think about it.

Recent NIOSH Investigative Reports

No comments

NIOSH has recently released the following Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation Reports:

F2008-20 May 06, 2007
Volunteer fire fighter dies while performing exterior fire suppression at a large machine shed fire – Illinois http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/fire/reports/face200820.html

F2008-12 Apr 08, 2008
Volunteer deputy fire chief dies when struck by motorized water monitor that “launched” off aerial ladder truck – Pennsylvania http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/fire/reports/face200812.html

F2002-22 Revision Sep 26, 2001
Fire fighter suffers fatal heart attack at fire at his residence – Florida http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/fire/reports/face200222.html

New Tactical Definitions: Where do you fit in?

No comments

I spent a large part of this past week, and the entire day and evening this past Saturday conscientiously working on refining sections of my lecture program that will be presented at this year’s Fire Department Instructors Conference (FDIC) in April.

I was deeply immersed in some research and in reviewing a number of case studies and line of duty death reports, while furthering my concepts related to a new methodology on fireground operations and command risk management that I call Five Star Command TM .

This got me thinking alot about the manner in which the modern fireground is managed, the way the current generation of firefighters and officers see themselves, and the manner in which strategic and tactical battle (IAP) are developed and executed. It got me thinking about what, we as firefighers are thinking when we find ourselves in the center of a “good” rockin’ job….I have been giving a lot of thought over the past couple of months to the continuing challenges and issues surrounding firefighter LODD and the issues of dynamic risk assessment, command decision-making and company level accountability. My recent lecture at the South Carolina Fire Academy’s annual Firefighter Safety & Health Conference provided an enlighten forum with a wealth of critical thinking and dialog amongst the attendees on firefighter safety, command risk assessment and tactical accountability related to opinions on the emerging new model of modern fire suppression strategies and tactics.

I got to thinking about the manner in which I functioned as a company officer when I first got promoted and the kinds of things we used to do; when we were young and both naïve to the true risks of fireground operations and filled with a sense of fireground invincibility. I know, I placed myself or found my company in positions and places of greater risk, “back in the day”, for the sake of getting more nozzle time in a well involved structure fire, or extended our stay-times in hostile places that were not safe or acceptable by today’s standards. WE, were lucky. Anyone of us could have then or even in the present day, could find ourselves in an instant, in the wrong place, operating under the wrong plan for all the wrong reasons. We looked for ways to increase our “playtime” for the pleasure, enjoyment, adrenaline rush, exuberance and at times euphoric pleasure doing what we do best; and that was fighting fires.

To think that this is not happening in today’s fire service would be absurd and illogical. If we look at the ways many departments, companies or personnel are operating on the fireground during structural fire operations and the places we are assigning and directing them to operate within, we would be asking ourselves, WHY?

There are tremendous national, state and locally efforts and initiatives directed at enhancing firefighter safety, reducing firefighter line of duty deaths and injury rates, on effective command management, skill development, competencies and cultural changes to improve and enhance the fire service. But it all has to start with the basic unit of operation; the Company, the Officer and personnel. Today’s incident scene and structural fires are unlike those in past decades and will continue to challenge us operationally when confronted with structural fire engagement and combat operations. Operationally, We need to be doing the right thing, for the right reason, at the right time and in the right place to increase our safety and incident survivability.

We need to stop “entertaining” ourselves, the job is dangerous, it has risks, we are not invincible, and we can die; at any alarm, in any fire, at anytime for any number of reasons…..Let me leave you with some new thoughts and concepts related to operational safety and the definitions that I’ve come to develop that may support apparent or contributing causes to many of the fire service’s undesired events or incidents.

Think about the definitions; think about how they apply to you, your company or your operations; past, present or future. I’ll share more insights on these evolving definitions in upcoming postings.

TACTICAL AMUSEMENT ˈtak-ti-kəl ə-ˈmyüz-mənt
1: of or relating to structural fireground tactics: as a (1) a means of amusing or entertaining during fire suppression, support tasks or operations that places personnel at risk
2: the condition of being amused while engaging in fire suppression, support tasks or operations that places personnel at risk
3: pleasurable diversion while engaging in fire suppression, support tasks or operations: entertainment; that places personnel at risk

TACTICAL DIVERSION ˈtak-ti-kəl də-ˈvər-zhən
1: the reckless act or an instance of diverting from an assignment, task, operation or activity while engaging in fire suppression, support tasks or operation for the sake of amusing or entertainment; that places personnel at risk
2: the reckless act of self determined task operations that diverts or amuses from defined risk assessment and incident action plans; that places personnel at risk

TACTICAL CIRCUMVENTION ˈtak-ti-kəl sər-kəm-ˈven(t)-shən
1: to deliberately manage to get around especially by ingenuity or approach that diverts for the purpose of amusing; assignment, operations or tasks that countermand or disregard defined risk assessment and incident action plans; that places personnel at risk
© 2009 Christopher J. Naum

Wood Frame Collapse

No comments

http://www.blogger.com/img/videoplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DqAAAAKXn9zyzXTyW6NoE_4ojujpedM27bKrwtTN5NKKo1IoeBS2HCtuaRaEaFVZySyqUMu-SMb6W65N-qFORvtogKXipZgoUjMKxkx0GCW7KBdfwfeBI7VL4y3HoZ2kavzlquiA-lZUSpPnv7tFnUYD3leRCJlzADp7N4wwRaYaScjDTDn58CJusbrrqd9Hw2z-nHbi3lOUQtYhmecGOndcv1BtCvvYqeVHQ_dFF0VgiIRYp%26sigh%3Dpm515aUZRtmalP2sxOZCV1z6imo%26begin%3D0%26len%3D86400000%26docid%3D0&nogvlm=1&thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dblogger%26contentid%3D319407b2699263d1%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw320%26sigh%3D3wIVv8johDbu28BFV0PfNQCxA4g&messagesUrl=video.google.com%2FFlashUiStrings.xlb%3Fframe%3Dflashstrings%26hl%3Den

Structural Collapse indicators require sound situational awareness of overall operational profiles, building conditions and operational task assignments. Wood Frame structures are impacted most significantly due to exposure and material degradation from direct flame impingement or failure mechanisims of crucial assembly connections or construction systems.

Frequent and Timely observations of structural conditions, impact of fire involvement and fire suppression operations conducted by response companies must be conducted. Establish appropriate collapse zones around the structural perimeter, utilize safety officers and practice effective risk assessment, situational awareness and incident monitoring to ensure operational safety. Collapse indications are sometimes VERY obvious….

Command and Company Officers

No comments

Company and Command Officers are crucial to the mission critical effectiveness and safety of company level operations, crew integrity and incident command management and successful mitigation.

What are the key elements that set apart those that can be considered “average” officers from those that are exceptional?

What key knowledge, skills, abilities and traits do they have that sets them apart?What knowledge, skills, abilities and traits do you have that contribute towards your effectiveness as an officer or those that you wish to aspire to?

How are you viewed by your personnel, by your peers, by your self? Are there area(s) for improvement?

Leadership, character, fortitude, skills, training, abilities, quality, temperament, strength, vision, courage, humility, modesty, compassion, authority, empathy……

“Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are” John Wooden

NIOSH issues the Charleston LODD Report

No comments

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Division of Safety Research, Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program, issued its long awaited report on the Charleston, SC Sofa Store Fire that occurred on June 18, 2007, in which nine career fire fighters died in the line of duty, when they became disoriented in rapidly deteriorating conditions inside a burning commercial furniture showroom and warehouse facility. At least seven other municipal fire fighters and two mutual aid fire fighters barely escaped serious injury.

NIOSH issued thirty-five (35) fire service based recommendations and eight (8) industry, organizational and municipal recommendations.

How many of these recommendations could apply to your organization?

NIOSH investigators concluded that, to minimize the risk of similar occurrences, fire departments should:

  • develop, implement and enforce written standard operating procedures (SOPs) for an occupational safety and health program in accordance with NFPA 1500
  • develop, implement, and enforce a written Incident Management System to be followed at all emergency incident operations
  • develop, implement, and enforce written SOPs that identify incident management training standards and requirements for members expected to serve in command roles
  • ensure that the Incident Commander is clearly identified as the only individual with overall authority and responsibility for management of all activities at an incident
  • ensure that the Incident Commander conducts an initial size-up and risk assessment of the incident scene before beginning interior fire fighting operations
  • train fire fighters to communicate interior conditions to the Incident Commander as soon as possible and to provide regular updates
  • ensure that the Incident Commander establishes a stationary command post, maintains the role of director of fireground operations, and does not become involved in fire-fighting efforts
  • ensure the early implementation of division / group command into the Incident Command System
  • ensure that the Incident Commander continuously evaluates the risk versus gain when determining whether the fire suppression operation will be offensive or defensive
  • ensure that the Incident Commander maintains close accountability for all personnel operating on the fireground
  • ensure that a separate Incident Safety Officer, independent from the IncidentCommander, is appointed at each structure fire
  • ensure that crew integrity is maintained during fire suppression operations
  • ensure that a rapid intervention crew (RIC) / rapid intervention team (RIT) is established and available to immediately respond to emergency rescue incidents
  • ensure that adequate numbers of staff are available to immediately respond to emergency incidents
  • ensure that ventilation to release heat and smoke is closely coordinated with interior fire suppression operations
  • conduct pre-incident planning inspections of buildings within their jurisdictions to facilitate
  • development of safe fireground strategies and tactics
  • consider establishing and enforcing standardized resource deployment approaches and utilize dispatch entities to move resources to fill service gaps
  • develop and coordinate pre-incident planning protocols with mutual aid departments
  • ensure that any offensive attack is conducted using adequate fire streams based on characteristics of the structure and fuel load present
    ensure that an adequate water supply is established and maintained
  • consider using exit locators such as high intensity floodlights or flashing strobe lights to guide lost or disoriented fire fighters to the exit
  • ensure that Mayday transmissions are received and prioritized by the Incident Commander
  • train fire fighters on actions to take if they become trapped or disoriented inside a burning structure
  • ensure that all fire fighters and line officers receive fundamental and annual refresher training according to NFPA 1001 and NFPA 1021
  • implement joint training on response protocols with mutual aid departments
  • ensure apparatus operators are properly trained and familiar with their apparatus
    protect stretched hose lines from vehicular traffic and work with law enforcement or other appropriate agencies to provide traffic control
  • ensure that fire fighters wear a full array of turnout clothing and personal protective equipment appropriate for the assigned task while participating in fire suppression and overhaul activities
  • ensure that fire fighters are trained in air management techniques to ensure they receive the maximum benefit from their self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA)
  • develop, implement and enforce written SOPS to ensure that SCBA cylinders are fully charged and ready for use
  • use thermal imaging cameras (TICs) during the initial size-up and search phases of a fire
    develop, implement and enforce written SOPs and provide fire fighters with training on the hazards of truss construction
  • establish a system to facilitate the reporting of unsafe conditions or code violations to the appropriate authorities
    ensure that fire fighters and emergency responders are provided with effective incident rehabilitation
  • provide fire fighters with station / work uniforms (e.g., pants and shirts) that are compliant with NFPA 1975 and ensure the use and proper care of these garments.

Additionally, federal and state occupational safety and health administrations should:

  • consider developing additional regulations to improve the safety of fire fighters, including adopting National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) consensus standards.

Additionally, manufacturers, equipment designers, and researchers should:

  • continue to develop and refine durable, easy-to-use radio systems to enhance verbal and radio communication in conjunction with properly worn SCBA
  • conduct research into refining existing and developing new technology to track the movement of fire fighters inside structures.

Additionally, code setting organizations and municipalities should:

  • require the use of sprinkler systems in commercial structures, especially ones having high fuel loads and other unique life-safety hazards, and establish retroactive requirements for the installation of fire sprinkler systems when additions to commercial buildings increase the fire and life safety hazards
  • require the use of automatic ventilation systems in large commercial structures, especially ones having high fuel loads and other unique life-safety hazards.

Additionally, municipalities and local authorities having jurisdiction should:

  • coordinate the collection of building information and the sharing of information between building authorities and fire departments
  • consider establishing one central dispatch center to coordinate and communicate activities involving units from multiple jurisdictions
  • ensure that fire departments responding to mutual aid incidents are equipped with mobile and portable communications equipment that are capable of handling the volume of radio traffic and allow communications among all responding companies within their jurisdiction.

It’s more than just Size-Up; Situational Awareness and Dynamic Risk Assessment

No comments

Dynamic Risk Assessment is commonly used to describe a process of risk assessment being carried out in a changing or evolving environment, where what is being assessed is developing as the process itself is being undertaken.
This is further problematical for the Incident Commander when confronted with competing or conflicting incident priorities, demands or distractions before a complete appreciation of all mission critical or essential information and data has been obtained. The dynamic management of risk is all about effective, informed and decisive decision making during all phases of an incident.
Situation Awareness, [SA], is the perception of environmental elements within a volume of time and space, the comprehension of their meaning, and the projection of their status in the near future. It is also a field of study concerned with perception of the environment critical to decision-makers in complex, dynamic situations and incidents.
Both the 2006 and 2007 Firefighter Near-Miss Reporting System Annual Reports identified a lack of situational awareness as the highest contributing factor to near misses reported.
Situation Awareness (SA) involves being aware of what is happening around you at an incident to understand how information, events, and your own actions will impact operational goals and incident objectives, both now and in the near future. Lacking SA or having inadequate SA has been identified as one of the primary factors in accidents attributed to human error (Hartel, Smith, & Prince, 1991) (Nullmeyer, Stella, Montijo, & Harden, 2005). Situation Awareness becomes especially important in work related domains where the information flow can be quite high and poor decisions can lead to serious consequences.
To the Incident commander, Fire Officer or firefighter, knowing what’s going on around you, and understanding the consequences is mission critical to incident stabilization and mitigation and profoundly crucial in terms of personnel safety. The integration of Situational Awareness and Dynamic Risk Assessment is a mission critical element in strategic incident command management and company level tactical operations as we go forward into the next decade.
Traditional incident scene size-up is antiquated and no longer appropriate or applicable to modern fire service operations.Situational awareness is a combination of attitudes, previously learned knowledge and new information gained from the incident scene and environment that enables the strategic commanders, decision-makers and tactical companies to gather the information they need to make effective decisions that will keep their firefighters and resources out of harm’s way, reducing the likelihood of adverse or detrimental effects.
According to a 1998 published TriData study report, “Situational Awareness is one of the most difficult skills to master and is a weakness in the fire community. The report goes on to state that “The culture must change so that [personnel] are observing, thinking, and discussing the situation constantly.” It’s all about implementing effective human performance tools; perceptions versus reality, expectations versus realization, comprehension and forecasting, informed decision-making and calculated and formulated risk.
It’s a whole lot more than just “Size-Up”.
What do you think?

Fire Service Leaders to Conduct Study to Improve Fire Fighter Safety and Deployment

1 comment

Funded by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), this firefighter safety and resource deployment study will help governments make informed decisions to better match resources with risks to the public and firefighters in their communities.“This is a study many fire industry leaders have dreamed of for several years,” says Chief Dennis Compton of the International Fire Service Training Association, a technical advisor to the project. “Until now, it has simply not been possible, due to the complexity of the tasks proposed and the costs involved.”

A broad coalition is participating in the study, including (in alphabetical order): Center for Public Safety Excellence; Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); Fairfax County (Va.) Fire and Rescue Department; International Association of Fire Chiefs; International Association of Fire Fighters; Montgomery County (Md.) Fire and Rescue Service; Urban Institute; and Worcester Polytechnic Institute. DHS has provided $1 million each for the two years of research through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program.Fire is a costly problem in our communities in both lives and property.

According to the National Fire Protection Association, in 2007 there were 530,500 structure fires that killed 3,000 civilians and injured more than 15,000, while causing $10.6 billion in property damage. About 100 firefighters die in the United States each year, with 9/11 being the exception, and many more are injured.Predicting the effects of changes to fire service resources is critical to fire service and local government leaders. “Currently local governments rely on trial and error or a qualitative basis,” explains NIST researcher Jason Averill. “When this study is complete, there will be objective data on which to base these important decisions.”The study focuses on the effects of crew size (two, three, four and five persons per fire engine) and apparatus arrival time (all engines/trucks arrive close together or arrive at longer intervals) on the fire conditions within one 2,000-square-foot, two-story home specially built to survive multiple fire conditions.

This “burn house” has been instrumented with state-of-the-art equipment to monitor the interior temperatures and toxic gas build-up within the structure. In addition, researchers will monitor 22 different tasks at the firefighting site, or “fireground.”“NIST has a long history of working with the fire service, and these experiments continue this important tradition,” says Shyam Sunder, director of NIST’s Building and Fire Research Laboratory. “With NIST’s expertise in measurement science, we aim to deliver reliable, accurate and timely data that local governments can use to maximize fire safety in their communities consistent with the risks that they face.”“The information gained from this study will have an immediate and direct impact on how we respond to fires and other emergencies in our communities.

Not only will this study provide scientific data to help local government decision makers with establishing an effective firefighting force, resource allocation and community risk assessment, it will furnish fire and emergency service leaders with the tools for a more efficient response to fire and EMS emergencies,” says Montgomery County Fire and Rescue Service Acting Fire Chief Richard Bowers. “This study will help make our businesses and communities safer places to live, work and enjoy.”

http://www.firereporting.org/
http://publicsafetyexcellence.org/

Check out FossilMedic’s (Mike Ward’s postings on Firegeezer)http://www.firegeezer.com/2008/04/22/time-on-task-and-outcomes-data…

Check out Dave Statter’s reports;
http://www.wusa9.com/video/default.aspx?maven_playerId=sec_news&maven;_referralObject=1023516014http://www.wusa9.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=81217&catid;=158

FATAL TRAINING FIRES: FIRE ANALYSIS FOR THE FIRE SERVICE-NIST

No comments

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has investigated the fire conditions of two very different fire training incidents that resulted in the loss of life. One incident occurred in an acquired structure and the other occurred in a concrete training tower.

In both cases, NIST conducted real scale fire experiments to gain insight into the thermal conditions that may have existed during the incidents. The results of the experiments will be presented and discussed so that future incidents of this type can be avoided. This is one of many studies by NIST to assist the fire service in the practical understanding of fire dynamics. The research will provide a summary of each incident and a discussion of how the incidents were simulated with real scale fire experiments.

In each incident, it appeared that extremely high heat conditions had occurred. The experiments examine the impact of fuel load, and the impact of the structure in terms of ventilation and heat transfer on the fire environment.

Since 2000, seven firefighters in the United States have lost their lives during “live-fire training evolutions” As a result of the deaths of two fire fighters in a “live-fire” training incident in 1982, The National Fire Protection Association’s Committee on Fire Service Training developed NFPA 1403, Standard on Live Fire Training Evolutions . The purpose of NFPA 1403 is “to provide a process for conducting live fire training evolutions to ensure that they are conducted in safe facilities and that the exposure to health and safety hazards for the fire fighters receiving training is minimized.” With regard to structural fire training, the standard addresses acquired structures and training structures. The training structure is specifically designed for conducting live fire training evolutions on a repetitive basis, while the acquired structure requires additional inspection and preparation for the training evolutions.

NFPA 1403 requires that instructors and safety officers have knowledge of fire behavior. This is important because the standard has limitations on fuels that can be used for training. The directives given are qualitative and without further guidance. For example, “Fuel materials shall only be used in the amounts necessary to create the desired fire size” or “The fuel load shall be limited to avoid conditions that could cause an uncontrolled flashover or backdraft” . Typically, fire training officers, instructors and fire fighters are in need of assistance in making these types of assessments.

The purpose of the NIST fire fighter training research program that is being conducted at NIST with the support of the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Fire Administration and the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health is to provide data and information to enable the required assessments. The examination of the following training fire fatalities will serve as a means to transfer the information to the fire service.

http://www.fire.gov/training/index.htm

U.S. EXPERIENCE WITH SPRINKLERS AND OTHER AUTOMATIC FIRE EXTINGUISHING EQUIPMENT- NFPA REPORT

No comments

Automatic sprinklers are highly effective elements of total system designs for fire protection inbuildings. When sprinklers cover the area of fire origin, they operate in 95% of all reported structure fires large enough to activate sprinklers. When they operate, they are effective 96% of the time, resulting in a combined performance of operating effectively in 91% of reported fires where sprinklers were present in the fire area and fire was large enough to activate sprinklers.

When wet-pipe sprinklers are present in structures that are not under construction and excluding cases of failure or ineffectiveness because of a lack of sprinklers in the fire area, the fire death rate per 1,000 reported structure fires is lower by 80% for home fires, where most structure fire deaths occur, and the rate of property damage per reported structure fire is lower by 45-70% for most property uses.

Also, when sprinklers are present in structures that are not under construction and excluding cases of failure or ineffectiveness because of a lack of sprinklers in the fire area, 94% of reported structure fires have flame damage confined to the room of origin compared to 74% when no automatic extinguishing equipment is present. When sprinklers fail to operate, the reason most often given (63% of failures) is shutoff of the system before fire began. (All statistics are based on 2003-2006 fires reported to U.S. fire departments, excluding buildings under construction.)

http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files//PDF/OSsprinklers.pdf

USFA and NVFC Release Updated Health and Wellness Guide for the Volunteer Fire and Emergency Services

No comments

The U.S. Fire Administration (USFA), working with the National Volunteer Fire Council (NVFC), has issued a revised Health and Wellness Guide for the Volunteer Fire and Emergency
Services.

The Health and Wellness Guide now provides updated information on health and wellness issues, trends, and programs focused on the needs of the volunteer fire service. The document addresses fitness including aerobic exercise, flexibility, strength training, diet; smoking cessation; and other areas that will have a positive impact on volunteer firefighters.

The prevalence of cardiovascular illness and deaths and work-inhibiting strains and sprains among firefighters illustrates the need for a comprehensive health and wellness program in every department. Yet department leaders often struggle to implement a program due to a variety of reasons, including resistance or lack of motivation from members, the costs associated with implementing a program, and the lack of well-defined requirements.

The Health and Wellness Guide demonstrates ways to overcome these obstacles, and provides direction for developing and implementing a department program. It also highlights several existing health and wellness programs and how they have maintained their success over time. Originally released in 1992 and updated several times, the 2009 version includes new information and resources to help departments ensure the health and well-being of their members.

The Health and Wellness Guide for the Volunteer Fire and Emergency Services also provides the most current information on how volunteer fire departments can enhance compliance with appropriate National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Firefighter Health and Safety Standards such as NFPA Standard 1583 – Health Related Fitness Programs for Fire Fighters.

http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/media/press/2009releases/020509.shtm

2009 Fire/EMS Safety, Health and Survival Week Theme Announced

No comments

Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health and Survival Are Your Responsibility June 14-20, 2009

Protect Yourself: Your Safety, Health and Survival Are Your Responsibility encourages chiefs and fire/EMS personnel to focus on what they personally can do to manage risk and enhance their health and safety.

This year’s theme reflects the need for personal responsibility and accountability within a strong safety culture.Recommended activities and materials will incorporate four key areas where standard operating procedures, policies and initiatives—along with the training and enforcement that support them—can limit fire/EMS personnel’s risk of injury or death:

Safety: Emergency Driving (enough is enough—end senseless deaths)

  • Lower speeds—stop racing to the scene. Drive safely and arrive alive to help others.
  • Utilize seat belts—never drive or ride without them.
  • Stop at every intersection—look in all directions and then proceed in a safe manner.

Health: Fire Fighter Heart Disease and Cancer Education and Prevention

  • Don’t smoke or use tobacco products.
  • Get active.
  • Eat a heart-healthy diet.
  • Maintain a healthy weight.
  • Get regular health screenings.

Survival: Structural Size-Up and Situational Awareness

  • Keep apprised of different types of building materials and construction used in your community.
  • Develop a comprehensive size-up checklist.
  • Always complete a 360° walk of the structure to collect valuable, operational decision-making information.
  • Learn the practice of reading smoke.
  • Be familiar with the accepted rules of engagement.
  • Learn your accountability system and use it.
  • Master your tools and equipment.
  • Remain calm and concentrate.

Chiefs: Be the Leader in Safety

  • Become personally engaged in safety and make it part of your strategic vision for the department.
  • Be willing to make the tough decisions regarding safety policies and practices and their implementation.
  • Hold members of the organization accountable for their safety and the safety of those with whom they work.
  • Ensure that resources are available to accomplish activities safely and effectively.

All fire/EMS departments are encourage to devote this week to reviewing safety policies, evaluating the progress of existing initiatives and discussing health and fitness. Fire/EMS departments should make a concerted effort during the week to correct safety deficiencies and to provide training as needed. An entire week is provided to ensure that each shift and duty crew can spend one day focusing on fire fighter safety, health and survival.

Here’s the question to ask around the table today…What are YOU personnally doing to ensure YOUR safety during combat fire engagement and the safety of your COMPANY?

Remember this; Everyone thinks that “bad” things happen to someone else, that they won’t happend to YOU, because of what you do, what you know…….However, to everyone else YOU are that “someone else”….think about it…

http://www.iafc.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr;=306

FDNY High-Rise Operations Symposium

No comments

FDNY High-Rise Operations Symposium
March 19 & 20, 2009


The FDNY responds to more than two million calls each year. Many of these responses are in high-rise buildings.The information presented will assist Firefighters, Line Officers, Fire Chiefs, Building Managers and Fire Engineers create solutions to problems unique to high-rise buildings.During the Department’s 143-year history, we continue to develop more advanced procedures, tools and training.

FDNY Chief Officers currently operating as Incident Commanders will provide these lifesaving lessons and techniques.

The Wind-Driven Fire Study was supported by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) for Firefighter Safety Research and Development. The study was a partnership project led by Polytechnic Institute of N.Y.U., the New York City Fire Department and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

Topics will include:• Crane Collapses• Firefighting Strategies and Tactics• EMS Operations• Building Evacuations• Study of High-Rise Wind-Driven Fires • Planning for Terrorist & Haz-Mat Incidents• New Tools and Solutions

DON’T MISS OUT ON THIS ONE-OF-A-KIND EDUCATIONAL EVENT!
http://www.fdnyfoundation.com/2008/10/highrise_sympos.php

Lecturer Biographical Information
Sign Up as an Attendee
Sign Up as an Exhibitor

The USFA Issued the 2007 Firefighter Fatalities Report- Read It!

No comments

The United States Fire Administration (USFA) has released today its report Firefighter Fatalities in the United States in 2007. The report continues a series of annual studies by the USFA of on-duty firefighter fatalities in the United States. The USFA is the single public agency source of information for all on-duty firefighter fatalities in the United States each year.”One of the greatest challenges we face as a fire service is to stop the needless deaths of firefighters while in service to their communities,” United States Fire Administrator Greg Cade said. “Every day and across this nation, firefighters are responding to emergencies that threaten the lives of their residents. These same threats also threaten the lives of firefighters.Unfortunately, we all lost far too many firefighters in 2007.”
During calendar year 2007, there were 118 firefighters who lost their lives while on duty across the United States.The unique and specific objective of Firefighter Fatalities in the United States is to identify all on-duty firefighter fatalities that occurred in the United States and its protectorates, and to present in summary narrative form the circumstances surrounding each occurrence.
In addition to the 2007 overall findings, this study includes information on the hazards to firefighters presented by the lack of seatbelt use.
In 2007, 27 firefighter fatalities resulted from vehicle-related incidents.
In 19 of the 27 incidents where seatbelt status was known, 11 firefighters were confirmed as not wearing seatbelts at the time of the event.An overview of the 118 firefighters that died while on duty in 2007:
• 68 volunteer firefighters and 50 career firefighters died while on duty.
• There were 7 firefighter fatality incidents where 2 or more firefighters were killed, claiming a total of 21 firefighters’ lives.
• 11 firefighters were killed during activities involving brush, grass, or wildland firefighting, the lowest in over a decade.
• Activities related to emergency incidents resulted in the deaths of 76 firefighters.
• 38 firefighters died while engaging in activities at the scene of a fire.
• 26 firefighters died while responding to or returning from emergency incidents.
• 11 firefighters died while they were engaged in training activities.
• 15 firefighters died after the conclusion of their on-duty activity.
• Heart attacks were the most frequent cause of death for 2007, with 52 firefighter deaths.
For the past 22 years, the USFA has tracked all firefighter fatalities and conducted the necessary analysis for the benefit of the fire service. Through the collection of information on the causes of firefighter deaths, the USFA is able to focus on specific problems and direct future efforts towards finding solutions to reduce the number of firefighter fatalities in the future.
This information is also used by many organizations to measure the effectiveness of their current efforts directed toward firefighter health and safety.The National Fallen Firefighter Foundation maintains the list of firefighters who die in the line-of-duty and are honored during the annual National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend held each October in Emmitsburg, Maryland.

Building Knowledge = Firefighter Safety

No comments
Buildingsonfire.com
Launching Early 2009
An Informational, Reference and Training web site Dedicated to the Art & Science of Building Construction, Firefighting and Command Risk Management
Advancing Training, Knowledge, Skill Development and Safety Focus for the Fire Service, and Supporting the NFFF Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives & EGH program

Editorials
Multimedia
Articles & News
Podcasts & Webcasts
Training Support Media
Case Studies & Reports
Research & Reference Links
Comprehensive Documents & Files
Forums & interactive Simulations
Seminars and Lecture Series
Training Aides and Drills
On-Line Training
Downloads

No comments

Christopher J. Naum, SFPE

Christopher J. Naum, SFPE is a 35-year fire service veteran and a former Fire Chief/ Fire & Safety Coordinator at a U.S nuclear power plant and previously served as a commanding company officer for over twenty years in field operations with a volunteer fire department in New York. He is presently the Chief of Training for the Command Institute, a Washington, DC based emergency management & training organization with a focus on research, development & policy insights . A nationally recognized authority on building construction, structural collapse and command management, he has traveled throughout the United States, and internationally delivering training programs on building construction, command risk management and firefighter safety.
An Adjunct Instructor with the National Fire Academy, he specializes in training courses for Structural Collapse, Building Construction and Firefighter Safety & Health. A Contributing Editor with Firehouse Magazine since 1988 and Firehouse.com since 2002, he regularly authors numerous articles on building construction, firefighting operations, command, leadership and special technical rescue operations. He authors the periodic column at Firehouse.com entitled- Structural Anatomy of Buildings and also authors the new Firehouse.com blog; Structural Anatomy of Buildingsonfire that focuses on building construction, command risk management and firefighter safety. He also advocates and writes extensively within various fire service internet training forums and groups including Firehouse.com, Fire Engineering, FireRescue1 and Firefighter Nation where he authors the Building Construction & Firefighter Safety Groups and Command Safety forum. The recipient of numerous awards and commendations, he was the 1987 ISFSI George D. Post National Fire Instructor of the Year as presented by the International Society of Fire Service Instructors. He has been a frequent lecturer and faculty member at numerous national and international conferences, schools, institutions and training programs including, Firehouse Expo, FDIC, IAFC FRI, ISFSI and numerous others.
In addition, Mr. Naum has over fourteen years of experience within the areas of architectural design and planning having served as a project architect for an architecture & engineering firm. He has served on numerous FEMA, USFA, NFPA, IAFC and ISFSI task forces, committees and panels over the past thirty years and holds full professional member grade Fire Protection Engineer-SFPE, status from the Society of Fire Protection Engineers.The Second Vice President with the International Society of Fire Service Instructors, he is an active supporter and participant of the NFFF, The Everyone Goes Home Initiatives, a New York State Firefighter Safety Advocate and a resource contributor to National Near-Miss Reporting Systems. A member of the IAFC since 1987, he served over ten years as a charter member of the IAFC Urban Rescue Structural Collapse Committee and is a member of the Safety, Health & Survival Section and the Volunteer Chief Officers Section. He serves on the Board of Directors with the International Association of Fire Chiefs, Safety, Health & Survival Section (IAFC SH&S;) and the Board of Directors of the Open Fire Academy International (OFA).
He continues to present his popular structural anatomy building construction training series throughout the United States and internationally and is the developer of the informational portal Buildingsonfire.com dedicated to building construction, command risk management and firefighter safety, launching in January 2010. Buildingsonfire (Facebook) informational insights are also now being posted on Facebook. He is presently authoring a new text book integrating building construction, risk management and firefighter safety and provides insightful firefighter safety commentary on his Taking it To the Streets Blog at http://commandsafety.blogspot.com/ and thru two twitter accounts at Commandsafety and Buildingsonfire (Bldgsonfire). Chief Naum has developed and delivered training to over 178,000 personnel nationally and internationally throughout his career. He can be reached at Christopher.naum@gmail.com

BECOME SAFE

No comments

Can the Command and Company Officer truly make a difference in the outcome
during structural fire combat?
If they can make a difference – what tools are required to succeed?
What are the relationships to; Knowledge, Experience, Technical skills, Proficiency, Core values, Depth and degree of separation, Maturity and stability, Cue-based mastery, Learning curves, Variables of liabilities, Community-based risks…
There are basic sets of parameters that can provide all operating personnel at structural fire operations with effective tools to increase operational effectiveness, safety and enhance incident stability and lead the forward progress towards event mitigation.
This includes the effective integration of BECOME SAFE (Naum, 2004) concepts;
Building,
Evaluation,
Construction/occupancy,
Operational hazards,
Manage time and elements,
Engagement,
Situational awareness,
Assessment and dynamic analysis,
Fire behavior and effects,
Evaluate and execute
The best defense firefighters have against building collapse is to understand the principles of building construction and the effects that fire has on a building; then apply this information on the fireground. Sometimes collapse indicators are evident in the initial size-up, but more often they are discovered by members operating in and around the fire building.